I was right both times... if you are not a judge (I was
addressing sgforumners, not judges)... you need to be GODS in order
to judge
Judges need not be GODS to judge because they are paid to do that
and "jurisdiction ":
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
All quotes (in bold) from Wikipedia
[b]1. In law, jurisdiction (from the Latin ius, iuris meaning "law"
and dicere meaning "to speak") is the practical authority granted
to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to
deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by
implication, to administer justice within a defined area of
responsibility. Do you have the "jurisdiction" to
condemn?
2. Omniscience is the capacity to know everything
infinitely, or at least everything that can be known about a
character including thoughts, feelings, life and the universe, etc.
In monotheism, this ability is typically attributed to God. This
concept is included in the Qur'an, where God is called "Al-'aleem"
on multiple occasions. This is the infinite form of the verb
"alama" which means to learn.If you cannot know
"everything" are you sure that your condemnation has taken
"everything" into consideration?
3. Rules of evidence govern whether, when, how, and for
what purpose proof of a case may be placed before a trier of fact
for consideration.Are you so sure that the evidence that
you use to condemn someone complies with the "Rules of evidence"?
and whose "RULES"?[/b]
Having to explain every little thing to you makes me feel like I
am talking to a kid.. *haiz* 
