Miscellaneous Topics on Buses

last SG · 2013-03-22T22:45:39+00:00

Good BIS will closed down forever,HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!yeah no more creepy clones ... *cough*

BusAnalayzer SG

Forget about numbering. it is quite complex.

I still don't understand how they decide on numbers of bus services.

For example: why is first punggol feeder introduced numbered as 386 and not 381 while the second punggol feeder is 382?

Why is CCK feeder to Keat Hong 308 when 307 is intra-town and numbers 303, 304, 305, 306 can still be used for feeder?

It is very strange how they decide on bus number.

Similarly St. Mike-Tampines service could be 126 instead of 129. Why have they dropped out 126 and used 127 and 129 instead?

Does anyone know how they decide on bus numbers?

Sbs6750E SG

North East should use 10x and 11x.
YCK svc can use 71.

Sbs6750E SG

Forget about numbering. it is quite complex.

I still don't understand how they decide on numbers of bus services.

For example: why is first punggol feeder introduced numbered as 386 and not 381 while the second punggol feeder is 382?

Why is CCK feeder to Keat Hong 308 when 307 is intra-town and numbers 303, 304, 305, 306 can still be used for feeder?

It is very strange how they decide on bus number.

Similarly St. Mike-Tampines service could be 126 instead of 129. Why have they dropped out 126 and used 127 and 129 instead?

Does anyone know how they decide on bus numbers?

129 because it suplement sv 139.

dupdup77 SG

That was not meant to serve any purpose. It is just like 5x = Bishan, 85x = Yishun, 96x = Woodlands. The numbers 24, 27, 34 etc can be used for Tengah services.

Hi mr sbs3004X, no purpose to re-number. Lots of people already got used to it. Moreover, the services do not originate from changi airport. Changi airport is just a looping point. Cheers. Thanks.

SMB1368T SG

127 should use 71 instead...unless they want to use the number for Tampines North int

Sbs6750E SG

Bidadari might use 311, 313 etc for feeders.

carbikebus SG

Forget about numbering. it is quite complex.

I still don't understand how they decide on numbers of bus services.

For example: why is first punggol feeder introduced numbered as 386 and not 381 while the second punggol feeder is 382?

Why is CCK feeder to Keat Hong 308 when 307 is intra-town and numbers 303, 304, 305, 306 can still be used for feeder?

It is very strange how they decide on bus number.

Similarly St. Mike-Tampines service could be 126 instead of 129. Why have they dropped out 126 and used 127 and 129 instead?

Does anyone know how they decide on bus numbers?

127 and 129 is Bedok North Depot and not Ang Mo Kio or Braddell.

SBS3004X SG

Bidadari might use 311, 313 etc for feeders.

No. 31x is already used for Serangoon feeders. 34x, 36x and 39x are not used.

SBS3004X SG

127 and 129 is Bedok North Depot and not Ang Mo Kio or Braddell.

129 passes by BRBP and St Michaels terminal is under BRBP. Why is BRBP not having partial control?

SMB1368T SG

more likely to use 34X series instead

BusAnalayzer SG

Basically no one seems to know how numbering system works with LTA?

Is it that every depot has been allocated a few numbers to house services? I doubt.

is it that there are 4-5 route planners and everyone choses an exclusive numnber and the planner whose route is the best, that number is selected? I have my doubts on that too.

gekpohboy SG

Any likelihood that 182, 192 and 193 may be re-numbered in future, when Tuas MRT opens?

Cos @s you all know, 18-numbers are generally in Bukit Panjang and Clementi area, whereas 19-numbers are generally in Bukit Timah and Queenstown area.

Any possibility that they may re-number them to 248, 249, 250, which are "more Jurong" than 182, 192 and 193?

BusAnalayzer SG

DDS are back on 851.

Lush green 5784B heading towards Bijoy Merah at 330pm spotted at City Hall (only 5-6 pax onboard)

carbikebus SG

129 passes by BRBP and St Michaels terminal is under BRBP. Why is BRBP not having partial control?

Then 26 terminate at Bedok why Bndep doesn't control it?Svc 5 passby LYDEP why LTA doesn't give GA instead of 136?

Sbs6750E SG

http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/hypeâŚ=1480993065
Aiyo, wasted sia. China made products really.

carbikebus SG

Well,China is rich now.They don't even give a hoot.

AntiDennisLance SG

So sad for the two security guards.

wsy1234 SG

http://www.go-ahead.com/content/dam/go-ahead/corporate/documents/stakeholder_reports/Go-Ahead%20Verification%20Statement_2016_Issued%20051016.pdf

http://www.busandcoachbuyer.com/go-ahead-publishes-sustainability-report/

BusAnalayzer SG

Then 26 terminate at Bedok why Bndep doesn't control it?Svc 5 passby LYDEP why LTA doesn't give GA instead of 136?

Would have been good if 85 was with SBS and 5 was given to GA. At least 5 would have got full fleet or almost full fleet DD under GA. sv 5 is one of the most ignored services under SBS in recent times.

SBS 9256 X SG

127 and 129 is Bedok North Depot and not Ang Mo Kio or Braddell.

So Svc 129 confirm not controlled by AMDEP eventhough other services in St Mich are controlled by AMDEP & BRBP?

« Previous Page Next Page »