Miscellaneous Topics on Buses

last SG · 2013-03-22T22:45:39+00:00

Good BIS will closed down forever,HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!yeah no more creepy clones ... *cough*

TPS Timothy Mok SG

302 need 9 WAB to pass WAB.. Currently only always see these 8 WAB apperaing:

(BSEP A22) SMB3163D SMB8012Z SMB8019E SMB8020A SMB8021Y SMB8028D SMB8032R

302 yes, 67 negative, 960 negative. 190 bare pass. 188 can. 176 can. 903, 912, 913 got no choice.

300 & 806 are feeder services that don't want to be WAB.

carbikebus SG

67 Kranji side 60% WAB Amdep side 55% WAB also cannot get WAB??

BusAnalayzer SG

302 yes, 67 negative, 960 negative. 190 bare pass. 188 can. 176 can. 903, 912, 913 got no choice.

300 & 806 are feeder services that don't want to be WAB.

It is not about don't want to be. There aren't enough HC WAB buses for existing WAB made buses to be compliant.

LTA should give SMRT huge fine for non complying.

lemon1974 SG

It is not about don't want to be. There aren't enough HC WAB buses for existing WAB made buses to be compliant.

LTA should give SMRT huge fine for non complying.

maybe it is LTA who force SMRT to declare WAB status for these feeder services, as lots of PIW are unable to take these feeder service to MRT stations...and thus LTA also help in deploying more A22...

so at least there are chances that PIW can board these services..

lemon1974 SG

Mr Tan again blasted SBST/LTA over the RSAF open house shuttle/sv90 operation on LTA facebook.... there are at least 8-9 DDs operating on last weekend, which is almost full fleet for sv90... but he is claiming that SBST is operating sv90 at 20 mins frequency...and blasted SBST for deploying buses to sv90 accordingly to crowd at TPY interchange... not sure what he wan... maybe he wan SBST to standby 20-30 DDs at TPY to do sv90....

and even blasted SBST for not operating sv94...there is free shuttle from Eunos and why SBST want to operate sv94? it is public holiday/sunday, and SBST need to pay OT to their BCs.. so who is going to bear the additional wages?

SMB145B SG

again this self-proclaim guy. 94 is a weekday service to bridge EWL and PLAB

BusAnalayzer SG

Noticed today the walking that needs to be done from BPJ Road to DTL2 MRT is quite a bit. Hence, I don't think many people would like to transfer from 190 to DTL2 given that you will spend 10 mins just to do the transfer.

This also indicates why 190 loading still hasn't dropped.

casper86m SG

wah, so many people interested in bus

SBS3004X SG

Cameo Spotting threads can last half a year if they are created only after the previous one reaches 2000 posts.

It is already the last day of May, now it has only 269 posts.

gekpohboy SG

When the Tuas MRT stations open, I guess route 182 will be shortened to Tuas Bus Terminal, while route 192 will be amended to ply the entire Upper Jurong Road to cover Pasir Laba camp.

carbikebus SG

I would think svc 254 will start from Tuas looping at Joo Koon Circle instead and svc 185 will start from Joo Koon instead.

BusAnalayzer SG

I would think svc 254 will start from Tuas looping at Joo Koon Circle instead and svc 185 will start from Joo Koon instead.

There is no need for sv 185 to be extended. There is already 99 covering almost same parts like JW Ave 5, JW Ave 1, JE Ave 1. 185 at Soon Lee is good because I see during evening peak around 20-30 pax board sv 185 towards Jurong West district from first stop itself.

carbikebus SG

Thought will be good if 185 partner with 182 at JK?What if LTA decided to built a replacement depot for Soon Lee then?

BusAnalayzer SG

Thought will be good if 185 partner with 182 at JK?What if LTA decided to built a replacement depot for Soon Lee then?

Yes bro but there is still industrial estate at Soon Lee for whom there needs to be a bus service. Just to match the number with 182, I would not extend 185 to Joo Koon.

But had they not introduced 258, 185 could have been tweaked to terminate at Joo Koon, and have a new JIS service covering parts of Soon Lee/Kim Tian estate.

Just my proposal :)

SBS7557R SG

Yes bro but there is still industrial estate at Soon Lee for whom there needs to be a bus service. Just to match the number with 182, I would not extend 185 to Joo Koon.

But had they not introduced 258, 185 could have been tweaked to terminate at Joo Koon, and have a new JIS service covering parts of Soon Lee/Kim Tian estate.

Just my proposal :)

252 already covers the industrial developments along Soon Lee Rd.

BusAnalayzer SG

252 already covers the industrial developments along Soon Lee Rd.

Nope. Just a part. Yes, ofcourse you can force people to walk to 252 bus stop, but not ideal givent that it is quite a number of pax we are talking about.

SBS7557R SG

Nope. Just a part. Yes, ofcourse you can force people to walk to 252 bus stop, but not ideal givent that it is quite a number of pax we are talking about.

In that case, a good route extension proposal will be just to let 185 continue plying Soon Lee Rd, then utilize International Rd to Joo Koon Int.

BusAnalayzer SG

It is strange that 117 is not part of Loyang package. Now SBST will operate 117 out of Punggol and Sembawang with it as the only service.

I would have swapped 117 for 118. 118 could be BNDEP with 47 and 117 could go to Loyang.

Strange, isn't it?

carbikebus SG

It is strange that 117 is not part of Loyang package. Now SBST will operate 117 out of Punggol and Sembawang with it as the only service.

I would have swapped 117 for 118. 118 could be BNDEP with 47 and 117 could go to Loyang.

Strange, isn't it?

Why must 118 when 136 is out of the sequence?Can exchange 136 for 117.

SMB3163D SG

Which depot control the bt Gombak - Joo Koon svc? Busesingapore posted a pic SMB1646R (WL SP) on that service..

« Previous Page Next Page »