Route Suggestions (Part 6)

last SG · 2015-07-28T14:42:23+00:00

Hi mr pathlight, there is northeast MRT line. Cheers.Or Service 47: Joo Koon > Sengkang

dupdup77 SG

Do you realise that most of your posts are all shooting down other people's opinions? Who cares about the authority? Are you them? Do you actually know what they are going to do?

And confusing? Have you seen what "confusing" actually is?

Hi mr ihateu853, this is up to you to perceive. You have your opinions and I also have my opinions. I do not need to report to you. If you perceive as I shoot down other people opinions, so be it. I just speak the most reasonable thought I have.

How can sbs 117 be routed inside edgedale and edgefield plains and then back to Punggol way? Let's be logical. If the authorities really do that, then there will come another group of people to condemn it as being too excessive. Too long winded as well. Cheers. Thanks.

dupdup77 SG

It's okay I am not going to bother explaining further why I stated 384G/W. In the end, I may be right just like 386. Let's wait it out.

Hi mr busanalyser, don't be so assuming. Your 386 is only half right. Most importantly, if there is a 384G/W, it will not be converted from 84. The route towards northshore is different from Punggol road end. 84 is a trunk service and 38x series are feeder. They will be 2 different standalone services. Cheers. Thanks.

BusAnalayzer SG

NO WAY. 386 is just what I predicted that it would go to Edgedale Plains end and you said NOT possible.

384G/W can go to Punggol Northshore and Punggol Road end. Hence G/W. This will connect Northshore to Punggol End as well. Once this happens there is no need for 84. 84 is a trunk today. What I am talking of is in the future. Is it so difficult to understand??

And good, someone actually created an id "ihateu" for you. You deserve it. I really hope once again that you have nothing to do with LTA or PTOs because people with your attitude can only doomsday!!

And yes, you provoke users here. You are no better than PATHLIGHT.

SMB1368T SG

Firstly, I have to agree that 117 should not be amended like that. If you had seen the 117 pattern, people drop at Jln Kayu/SAP where there are lots of services and facilities. That is why many people take 117 as it provides connection to those areas, in addition to serve the workers from Jln Kayu to relieve 103.

Sure it is a bit confusing. Though I dont know if people really want to go to those areas. If not the amendment would have been made a while ago as it was the residents in my area who planned the idea to go straight to Punggol like 969 concept. I dont even want services like 966 to suffer overloading either

dupdup77 SG

NO WAY. 386 is just what I predicted that it would go to Edgedale Plains end and you said NOT possible.

And good, someone actually created an id "ihateu" for you. You deserve it. I really hope once again that you have nothing to do with LTA or PTOs because people with your attitude can only doomsday!!

And yes, you provoke users here. You are no better than PATHLIGHT.

Hi mr busanalyser, no way. Going by your previous posts, you also say you are half right about 386. Not full. So don't be that assuming.

The authorities will not convert a trunk service to a feeder service.

And please, that someone who create a new username is so naive. So childish. As for you, you are equally childish too to actually be so jovious to point out that I deserve it? I only voice my opinions. If people who disagree with me are really so childish to do that, let them be. I always view you as a gentleman who have good posts and good views. But now after you say this, I look down on you. Cheers. Thanks.

dupdup77 SG

Hi mr smb1368T, thanks for your support on my view that sbs 117 should not be routed like this. Cheers. Thanks.

SMB3163D SG

...lol??

dupdup77 SG

NO WAY. 386 is just what I predicted that it would go to Edgedale Plains end and you said NOT possible.

And good, someone actually created an id "ihateu" for you. You deserve it. I really hope once again that you have nothing to do with LTA or PTOs because people with your attitude can only doomsday!!

And yes, you provoke users here. You are no better than PATHLIGHT.

Hi mr busanalyser, my comments are for all to see. I do not provoke people. Please check out what you write. You are also no better than PATHLIGHT. You are damn childish to join others like 'ihateu853' to keep on hurling insults at me. What that guy does is wrong. But you as an adult should behave in an appropriate manner which befit your status. But you did not. I really see wrong of you.

ihateu853 SG

Hi mr busanalyser, no way. Going by your previous posts, you also say you are half right about 386. Not full. So don't be that assuming.

The authorities will not convert a trunk service to a feeder service.

...ou also don't be so assuming, you assume the authorities will follow your opinoins.

Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority?

Call me childish, that's up to you to perceive. Because I want to stand up for the people you have provok..

dupdup77 SG

...ou also don't be so assuming, you assume the authorities will follow your opinoins.

Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority? Are you the authority?

Call me childish, that's up to you to perceive. Because I want to stand up for the people you have provok..

Hi mr ihateu853, please grow up and you will mature more. When you want to argue against something, please do it with facts to back you up. Don't do this sort of unsubstantiated reasons to reinforce your opinion.

By routing sbs 117 in this manner, it will definitely inconvenience a lot of people. There is no point to stoke hatred among people. Argue with sensibility. And please also do the most sensible thing. No need to create a new nickname to spur hatred. We are all sensible people. You can always use your old nickname to voice your opinions sensibly. I encourage fruitful exchange of points. From now on, I will not bother to reply to points which created hatred. Cheers. Thanks.

ihateu853 SG

By routing sbs 117 in this manner, it will definitely inconvenience a lot of people. There is no point to stoke hatred among people. Argue with sensibility. Cheers. Thanks.

You should argue with sensibility as well. You are using the authorities as a reason to back you up, that is not having sensibility either.

Quoting BusAnalyzer "NO WAY. 386 is just what I predicted that it would go to Edgedale Plains end and you said NOT possible"

Your posts are always contradicting.

dupdup77 SG

You should argue with sensibility as well. You are using the authorities as a reason to back you up, that is not having sensibility either.

Quoting BusAnalyzer "NO WAY. 386 is just what I predicted that it would go to Edgedale Plains end and you said NOT possible"

Your posts are always contradicting.

Hi mr ihateu853, you do not know the full story before this issue. So your views may not be correct. He may be right about the 2nd part for sbs 386 but certainly not the full issue for sbs 386. There is a long background to this. Whatever I did is not against my conscience. I never go shoot people. I will only fight back when people attack me. That is natural for most people. Cheers. Thanks.

iveco SG

84 should be renumbered to 384 given that it is a Punggol feeder. Maybe they will do it once Punggol Northshore is up. Then 84 could become 384G/W.

If 84 become feeder 882 also can do the same. Both serve identical functions in their respective route groups.

SMB1368T SG

G/W routes must run in different directions but still serve same areas like how 382 & 225 work. However, I dont really know how 291 & 293 work.

Possible for 882 to operate like that. Just shelve it for now when Sembawang is still developing

SBS6853S SG

103A: Serangoon Int - Bef ST Airport Svcs (AM Peak only)

103 downroutes: Aft ST Airport Svcs - Serangoon Int (PM Peak from 1715-1745)

gekpohboy SG

Ignorance is bliss. Smile

dupdup77, I would like to recommend that you consider caring less about buses, and pursue other interests. Smile

reading literature is good. I know Punggol very ulu la, but you can always take MRT to serangoon nex library read book, or take bus to Paris Ris White sands library. Smile

carbikebus SG

Ignorance is bliss. Smile

dupdup77, I would like to recommend that you consider caring less about buses, and pursue other interests. Smile

reading literature is good. I know Punggol very ulu la, but you can always take MRT to serangoon nex library read book, or take bus to Paris Ris White sands library. Smile

Bro,If Punggol is ulu then Jurong West particularly also ulu leh.In future Punggol is one of the biggest estates along with Jurong/Woodlands/Tampines/Bedok..

SBS8002T SG

Service 74A Buona Vista Terminal - King Albert Park MRT (buses will downroute from King Albert Park MRT towards Buona Vista after completing a trip of 74A)

Supplements Svc 74 between Buona Vista MRT and Dover MRT and from Dover MRT to Ngee Ann Poly and SIM

With SWT 74A, I think Svc 74 can operate on a full DD fleet with 74A operating at 10-15mins frequency (full SD with 1-2 DDs, 74e SDs will operate as 74A before/after performing a trip of 74e)

I've often noticed a very huge crowd at Dover MRT during AM peak (towards SIM/NP) and after school hours where SP students go back to their homes (notably after 3pm) and I feel that Svc 74A can help to boost the frequency.

201911 SG

Service 74A Buona Vista Terminal - King Albert Park MRT (buses will downroute from King Albert Park MRT towards Buona Vista after completing a trip of 74A)

Supplements Svc 74 between Buona Vista MRT and Dover MRT and from Dover MRT to Ngee Ann Poly and SIM

With SWT 74A, I think Svc 74 can operate on a full DD fleet with 74A operating at 10-15mins frequency (full SD with 1-2 DDs, 74e SDs will operate as 74A before/after performing a trip of 74e)

The crowd between NP/SIM and Dover MRT/SP has always been there, just that svc 74 is relatively less crowded btw King Albert Park MRT and Marymount/AMK nowadays, cause many students now transfer to MRT instead. Good suggestion nonetheless.

201911 SG

Extended svc 403: Changi Business Park - Flora Dr - Pasir Ris (loop)

CBP Ter, CBP Ctrl 2, CBP Ave 3, Changi South Ave 3, Changi South Ave 2, Changi South Ave 1, Expo Dr, Upp Changi Rd East, Upp Changi Rd Nth, Flora Dr, Flora Rd, Old Tampines Rd, New Loyang Link, Loyang Ave, PSR Dr 1, PSR Dr 6, PSR Dr 3, PSR Ctrl, PSR Dr 1, Elias Rd, Pasir Ris Rd (loop)

return sector same except left turn directly from Loyang Ave into Old Tampines Rd

- connects Pasir Ris to Changi Business Park, as well as Flora Dr

- replaces lost sector of svc 20 along Changi South Ave 3 (see below)

- uses Expo Dr, which would be reopened after MRT works are done

Amended svc 20: Changi Business Park - Simei - Tampines (loop)

CBP Ter, Changi South Ave 1, CBP Vista, Changi South Ave 4, Changi South Ave 2, Changi South Ave 1, Expo Dr, Upp Changi Rd East, Simei Rd, Simei St 4, Simei St 3, Simei St 1, Simei Rd, Tampines Ave 2, Tampines Ave 5, Tampines Ave 4, Tampines Ave 7, Tampines Concourse, Tampines Ave 6, Tampines Ctrl 7 (loop)

- terminating at Changi Business Park Ter, freeing up space at Tampines Int

- deleted sector along Changi South Ave 3 replaced by svc 403

- connects Tampines Concourse to Tampines MRT and amenities

map: https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mid=1Bner9PEAnUdbi_cJU90LD9VDQIg&usp=sharing

« Previous Page Next Page »