Well... stop "teaching" and stop taking side of LTA every single
time. I "do not" criticize LTA all the time. They
are not perfect, but I defend their routes like sv 49, 121 and sv
386... even though many ppl criticize.
You irritate me... coz anyone posts anything...
u will say LTA will not allow this and LTA will not allow that...
let ppl post freely...
All I was suggesting is 116 needs to be amended. I also gave my
proposal which is definitely good and will not upset current
commuters. I don't see any reason why you should keep on arguing to
defend 116 which apart from me numerous other
users have said is waste of money or let me put it politically more
correct "not best use of our money".
If I was saying something similar about sv 4 or sv 20 or sv 50
or sv 972... yes you can shoot me down... but after telling
you that I have observed this service 20+ times at NEX on
20 different days... taken it 10+ times... observed it equal number
of times at HCI... you still want to show you are right... last
time you said "today I saw sv 116 has around 40 pax"... u are
saying 40 pax as if the bus is bursting. Your statement itself
shows that sv 116 rarely gets 40 pax also...
Go on the ground and observe. If not, just shut your mouth. And
I will be harsh with you, coz you really irritate me with your
nonsensical posts. Sorry others for my language.
Hi admin, if you can ban people, I suggest you ban mr
busanalyser from sgbuses. Show them you are not afraid of banning
popular but totally rude and disrespectful people. See the way this
was written. This is not the first time. Totally lack of respect.
Suggesting I am being bought over. Oh my goodness. Admin, I hope
you can do something about this. Cheers.
Admin, please ban mr busanalyser from sgforums. Do not be rude
to fellow forumers. Thanks.
What kind of a rivalry
is this?
