I think it's because ladies are getting more media attention
than guys (in general), so there is a perceived rise of woman in
the social hierarchy. It's rarer to see big firms with female CEOs,
so such female CEOs often become a celebrity in the eyes of the
feminist media reporter.
Why should there even be a revenge in the first place? Dominance
is borned out of competition. The word revenge implies women has
been wronged for centuries. If not for men (and WWII), would ladies
be given the grace to join the workforce? What wrong?
For now, we begin to see extra-ordinary women rising beyond
ordinary men. But remember, numbers play an important rule. One
extra-ordinary woman is not enough to beat many extra-ordinary
men.
