New Sengkang Feeder Service 371

last SG · 2014-01-15T20:02:48+00:00

You all ah really tok kong,its just a feeder svc relax layeah lor... 10 bus stops only.... how? 4 Wrights, 4 Citaros.

SBS8676Z SG

Very good, this is what I call appropriate planning.

Now I will feel like taking the old 371...

I wonder if B10M will cameo since they may still have the desto?

Anyways thanks for the info!

Old 371 is now known as the current 163M

SBS8676Z SG

2785 today cross over to 371 during mealbreak

Around what time u spotted it?

TIB1096A SG

SERIOUS?!

WOAH ZUN SIA ME (haha jkjk)

Anyway did u see it? Is it using a proper (at least a front) desto?

Avant Garde full set

SMB128B SG

Avant Garde full set

Oh... Nice

SMB128B SG

Old 371 is now known as the current 163M

Yeah, but sadly it's never the same...

BusAnalayzer SG

Yeah, but sadly it's never the same...

Keep crying and cribbing... New service, not enough for you... Still want to be sad over old things. Moron!

SBS3004X SG

Old 371 is now known as the current 163M

Don't need 371 already, charge feeder fares foe 163M

SBS8676Z SG

Don't need 371 already, charge feeder fares foe 163M

163M should merge with 371 to form a Townlink in Sengkang.

Frankly speaking for 163M, I feel that this service is very redunctant ever since 50 was introduced, always see an empty bus especially when it bunches up with 163. If I am not wrong that fleet add for the additional full day 163M was implemented way back just before the GE2011 election.

Good move that SBST had reduced the number of 163M trips for weekdays afternoon peak and increase more trips for 163 instead.

SMB128B SG

Keep crying and cribbing... New service, not enough for you... Still want to be sad over old things. Moron!

Well did I?

Did I even say its not enough? I'm just saying it will never be like old 371, and it's true what. 163M only has one bus okay.

And did I keep doing that?

You are just a useless fucking asshole, calling other people name-callers when you yorself is no better. And you don't even admit to mistakes! Don't know why there must be people like you here... What a useless fucker.

Didn't even offend u and you want to be keyboard warrior and cause trouble, thinking ppl will agree to u but they will NOT. Calling yourself "peacemaker" somemore. Oh the irony. Fucks to you, motherfucker!

BusAnalayzer SG

Well did I?

Did I even say its not enough? I'm just saying it will never be like old 371, and it's true what. 163M only has one bus okay.

And did I keep doing that?

Lol. I like that you are shooting your top. This means I must have really frustrated you. Mission accomplished for people like you

BusAnalayzer SG

163M should merge with 371 to form a Townlink in Sengkang.

Good move that SBST had reduced the number of 163M trips for weekdays afternoon peak and increase more trips for 163 instead.

I agree to your point. 163M is completely redundant now, but it will stay as LTA will not allow SBST to completely remove it. So now only one bus. There was a time when you needed DDs for 163M. Now, 50 does the job. 163 is mainly used for those who want to transfer to other services on Punggol Road. To MRT, sv 50 is faster.

carbikebus SG

163 should take 2 DDs out for SDs.

BusAnalayzer SG

163 should take 2 DDs out for SDs.

No should not. AM peak load towards Thomson is still 70+. The loading has only dropped on the Sengkang - Fernvale sector. The DDs are for the AM/PM peak load that connects residential sectors in Sengkang with commercial sectors along YCK and Thomson.

SGCar SG

I would rather 163M to be withdrawn, and put 8132B to run on 163 full day instead. 163M spotted empty most of the time. And the non-WAB SD slot should use DD instead, as 163 ridership is increasing.

Cheers.

Gus.chong SG

In the past I discussed about 163M to be withdrawn with people here but I can't remember whether they have disagreed about it...

SBS3004X SG

BSEP. Services can't be withdrawm.

BusAnalayzer SG

In the past I discussed about 163M to be withdrawn with people here but I can't remember whether they have disagreed about it...

Ideally it should be withdrawn but this whole BSEP/LTA/MLA thing will also not let loss making services 115, 163M to get withdrawn.

carbikebus SG

I dun know that 115 is under bsep...

carbikebus SG

4 peak hours DDs not enough ah?The most you see 3 buses only full during that period.

BusAnalayzer SG

4 peak hours DDs not enough ah?The most you see 3 buses only full during that period.

There are just 5 DDs anyway. Your proposal was to change 2 slots to SD.

« Previous Page Next Page »