Hmmm.
Looks like you haven't been reading properly.
By saying EQUAL, I mean that we should not disregard 190 too.
But by trading 190 for 160 and 170 does that reall solve any
problems in general?
Later some guy go take situation at CIQ again. Would YOU like
that?
I repeat again. MY solution is to trade 190 for ANOTHER SVC, can
be all SD as you said. Like eg 66.
Speaking of 66, go observe it at three locations: Bedok, Little
India and Bukit Timah Rd. Management is horrible, freq all time
low, and bus often comes late. Once encountered missing 4 buses,
but no more than that. Okay so maybe SMRT can do no better you will
say, but isn't that better than 160 and 170? Or you tell me what
other solutions loh! Remember, aim is to solve prob in GENERAL
hor.
Didn't i already suggest to trade 66 for 854?
160/170 can be operated well with same number of buses from SMRT
side. I don't see what your issue here is. The solution is to
substitute services that need or can use only SDs with those that
require high capacity buses.
Hmmm.
Looks like you haven't been reading properly.
By saying EQUAL, I mean that we should not disregard 190 too.
But by trading 190 for 160 and 170 does that reall solve any
problems in general?
Later some guy go take situation at CIQ again. Would YOU like
that?
I repeat again. MY solution is to trade 190 for ANOTHER SVC, can
be all SD as you said. Like eg 66.
Speaking of 66, go observe it at three locations: Bedok, Little
India and Bukit Timah Rd. Management is horrible, freq all time
low, and bus often comes late. Once encountered missing 4 buses,
but no more than that. Okay so maybe SMRT can do no better you will
say, but isn't that better than 160 and 170? Or you tell me what
other solutions loh! Remember, aim is to solve prob in GENERAL
hor.
Also don't over-exaggerate the 66 situation. Frequency is not
bad and in fact has many other services along its way that
supplement the loading well. 67, 157, 174, 852 on Bukit Timah
stretch. 64, 65 on Little India side. 228 on Bedok side.