this joker is just having a direct dig at Icefatboy with this
thread... poor thing! a true no life man.. and a hopeless
punter...ahahahaha and BTW, your quote of Kenny Dalglish is not
strong enough to backup your claim of attacking football lor.. or
was it that you just know abt him nia.. hence no others to
quote...hahahahaha
now back to the topic... well, Kenny Dalglish did had quite a
couple of success with Liverpool as their manager, even thou it was
being widely regarded that that very team is so strong that they
will be able to win anything put infront of them even without a
manager... 
IMHO, attack is the best form of defends and i seriously think that
teams should play more attacking football if they want more netural
to suppport their club, however, in this modern era, plain
attacking football is not going to get you anywhere, gone are the
days of the proud Brazilan players where their thinking is as such
that if the other team score 1 goal we will score 3 kinda thingy..
these days strong defends are a must and not just strong in the
back 4 or 5 or 3 or whatever even strikers are make to put up the
1st line of defence once they lose possision of the ball.
oh and the best way to prove that defences is just as important as
attack is just look at the famous Kelvin Keegan's Newcastle back in
the 90s.. they are very very strong in attack but clueless in
defences hence much as they win lots of fans they can't quite win
the league..
also if you think that Dalglish's Blackburn is just abt attack then
you're wrong... they does play with a very sound defences too..with
players like Collien Henry, Henning Berg and Tim Flowers they can't
be considered as lousy right??? neither can they be classified as
attacking kingpin mah???
now..if only the smart alec can give me a couple of lopsided team
which wins lots of sucess then maybe we'll talk football in this
thread else its just his plain revenge on Icefatboy for starting
this thread..
