First of all, i was replying to lalaTearz and not you, Oh wait a
minute i did said he was your clone didn't i? sry i forgot... Do
read carfully my friend, i am not the want using offensive language
here... if any, you should be pointing it out to him/you... rather
than me... go read his/ur earlier post. He said read!!! ass! So i
only assume he was asking he arse to read right? 
I agree with you it not important but since you pick it up to
discuss, and got your earlier facts wrong and contradict me by
saying "i am sure that chelsea
did gain something out of mutu transfer i
remembered" i was just letting you know the facts
of your club better only.
Right or wrong move is not the point here. The point is the player
was punish with a ban for 7 months by Fifa for his behaviour.
Chelsea had a few alternatives, they could have either kept him for
7 months without pay, or kept him 7 months with pay or partial pay,
under these 2 options they will still be holding his contract and
is entitled to a transfer fee. Or sack him, terminate his contract,
meaning he no longer has a contract with the club.
Since they choose the 3rd option and stop paying him, which is
totally all right they should then not expect to get a transfer fee
for him right? After all, a fee is paid only when a player's
contract still exist and in this case, it no longer... He needs to
make a living also right, why do they still want to stop him from
joining another club when they no longer owns his contract? So they
expect him to end his football career?
Lastly, i thought i remind you again that next time, you should see
carefully before signing in as the wrong guy to answer peoples
posts so this way you won't be discredited.
Fyi, i was replying to lalaTearz and not you ghimpheng. Anyway
congrats chelsea won you should be happy. See i am a nice guy also.
