Read the topic and the story again. 
Understand the legal terms, misrepresentation, duress
and undue influence.
Duress and undue influence does not imply
physical force on the person, to tie him to a chair, put
a knife to his throat to force him to sign.
basically what you guys read about enyouth already...my
experience is more or less the same.. still feeling very very
angry, and betrayed..
to cut the long story short.. been
tricked by a former friend to come down to that enyouth
*coffeeshop*.. you know like long time never see den come
meet up.. then i kena psycho for few
hrs straight.. like they dun
let mi go until i sign the some "smart buyer" contract.. now
i feel pissed and so dumb for signing that shit.. but at least i
didn't pay that 50++ dollars.. they keep on telling me nvrmind no
need to pay first.. f* pressure and coerce la..
for you guys never get this exp before.. lucky you, it was
really the crappiest experience, that your friend can lie, cheat
you like this..
how now? not that i scared kena harassed by them now.. but am i
legally binded or anything to them(for anyone who has seen the
paper before)? the contract didn't say anything about paying- just
that they can "kick me out" for inactivity.. yea like i bloody want
to be in it.. i just wanted to go home..
after i read about all other ppl's exp with this shit, i am so
pissed off with myself.. but more with my so-called friend.. how
could he do this to me?? like he kena brain-washed.. now I am just
going to ignore the crap out of them..
anybody else recently got this kind of shit? seems to be getting
more and more common... yarrrrrrrrrrgh still so pissed..!
First point, he was tricked to
meet up with a friend... he was not tricked to signed the
contract... This point doesn't apply in him signing the
contract...
Psyco is not defined here...
Unless the presentation is a straight forward lie so that TS would
sign the contract, then its misrepresentation... But through out my
life, I've heard many people say they were psyco when it is simply
a positive presentation of their product... But in the end its
simply a presentation, an advertisement for the consumer to buy
their product...Unless TS can prove that they were lieing about
their product, we can only assume TS as simply bombarded with
positive presentation...
Wah kaoz... like that means its
already Penal Code Cap 224 Section 340 Wrongful Confinement
Wrongful confinement.
340. Whoever wrongfully restrains any person in
such a manner as to prevent that person from proceeding beyond
certain circumscribing limits, is said “wrongfully to confine” that
person.
Illustrations
(a) A causes Z to go within a walled
space, and locks Z in. Z is thus prevented from proceeding
in any direction beyond the circumscribing line of wall. A
wrongfully confines Z. (b) A places men
with firearms at the outlets of a building and tells Z
that they will fire at Z if Z attempts to leave
the building. A wrongfully confines Z.
like that TS should have called
999...
TS alway have the option to
leave... but instead, he listened to the presenters to stay so he
stayed... its TS own fault for not leaving...
For the record, I'm not with enyouth or whatever... I've just
studied business b4 and though business ethics are questionable
here, there is nothing legally wrong done here...
