you can only accuse, but you cannot prove
in fact i can answer this question, in what way i seem agitated?
why is it relevant?
my questions were more relevant because you accused me as such,
therefore unlike u, i can take you (as the opposite party) to task
for accusing without much basis or the guts to follow it
through
you now accused me of acting, so to take u to task again, in what
way is that line being 'acting' as you said it?
in short, i say stuff because i got the guts and the basis to
follow through, and if anyone tries to play punk, he deserved to be
taken to task for it
