The points raise were not new, but I like the way he wrote them
out
One point which is new to me is point 2. Didnt think about
it.
Meaning, they cannot be existing, like some claim, for 28 years or
even 5 years, unless they have legal name change, not just merely
registering a new company.
As for point 4, its something that have been highlighted but nobody
else care as long as they get their returns.
Point 3 is what we have learned few months ago, especially when
somebody exposed that Emcom Communications wasnt that Emcom in
Taiwan.
But like I said, they wont care as long as they get their
returns..for now..or when the schemes change again....
