to me this is quite sick
why should anyone be judged on whether they are friendly or not
friendly? if they say something wrong, they should be taken to
task, friendly or uncouthly
if anyone chose to brag about anything at all, they must be taken
to task and prove their points, or to provide a logical reasoning
for doing so, jonbonzi cannot do this, and disgustingly attempt to
steer away from the issue, and yet keep flaming others, and yet i
see you doing the same thing as him, putting down the need for
proof. could you explain why so?
btw, i was informed by the moderator this morning he is banned for
his behaviour
and the point of higher management not coming in here is
irrelevant, and if they are rookies, we all can see, glad you admit
this point, which brings me to your last point
if you say they are rookies, it goes to show that the company has
so many in the scheme is simply because they are rookies, 1001
rookies joined doesnt mean the company is ok, and it goes to show
your last statement is flawed
to me its 2 and 2 become 5, the number of people joining in a
scheme is never an indicator of strength...its quantitative and
superficial, and as many people posted before, there are numerous
indicators out there, including quality of products,
professionalism of agents in large etc
i am puzzled by your statement on greed, again 2 and 2 become 5, so
what if they are stars and supposedly earn big bucks? greed is
present, even in rich people
in fact, for your last paragraph, its totally illogical
we asked for a simple document
if he cant produce it, and divert from his incompetence or sheer
bragging by talking about other issues, then its can be simply
deduced no amount of criteria, however minimal, can bring about
anything
you could very well say we expected it to be the case, as with
experience with nti agents in this forum alone
