Urm, there is a name for this type of fallacious argument and i
cant think of the name offhand
The issue is about duty to prove income, not about the source and
benefit-cost of any type of income.
My previous post point to, two different types of income earners
having different level of duty and responsibilities in reporting
their income
Proof of income may not be the only indicator of the strength of
the scheme, but its one of the good gauges
MLM scheme differs from other schemes out there because they also
promote alternative source of income above the average income
earners salary
In short, if you cannot give good gauge of the income earning of
yourself or your uplines, its as simply as not telling people how
this scheme could be successful for them
Any damn MLM company will play along the same line, and who is to
know which company scheme is a scam and which is not, if they all
hide their earnings
