hi all... i'm new to the forum but this thread just happened to
catch my eye, especially the portions on NTI, james phang and
NOP.
i'm a distributor with NTI now and would like to offer opinions
coming from someone 'inside'... actually I'm not exactly sure that
NTI was started by james phang to recoup losses from NOP, because
the payout percentage is really pretty high.
And yes, i do admit that due to the high payout percentage, the
company is unstable and is in danger of folding up. That was
something that I was very concerned about as well when deciding
whether to join the company.
However, the reason why I finally decided to join NTI was based on
the scale as follows:
|-------------------|
Stability Opportunity
On one end of the spectrum, you have stability, with very
established companies at the forefront (won't mention names here
since the topic's on NTI). On the other end, you have opportunity,
with new and upcoming companies going all out to achieve
results.
I chose NTI due to the opportunity provided, with a compromise in
stability. A company cannot provide stability and opportunity at
the same time - it's either one or the other. Well, it all depends
on what you look for in a company.
As for the NOP ruckus, let's just say I couldn't be bothered to
find out. Today, a hinder to many people's progress is that they
cannot afford to put the past behind and look forward. Maybe it's a
generalisation or a sweeping statement on my part, but that's just
my 2 cents worth. I want to look ahead and see what NTI can provide
me with, not look back at the past and criticise mistakes or
wrongdoings.
Cheers.
