Hello! Here is my response to your comments: 
1) I find it strange that you 'dig' a bit over the top when you are
not involved. If you say that one is not involved in say, a company
but one must still find out, then I believe there are a lot of
other things in this world for you to find out, aren't there?
2) "bringing police action against nti might not help, as i
emphasise and explain again and again" Says who? How do you know it
won't help? Are you a policeman? So posting on a forum will help?
Suckers (could be anyone, even our loved ones) are born every
minute. Will they listen to me when I have not even worked in that
company before? It's like asking a beautician for advice on oral
care. Action speaks louder than words.
3) Nobody said anything about getting your main source of info from
close associates, but you claim to know James Phang, his close
associates etc. Wow. Does that mean if I say that I know SM Lee my
words become more credible? I might know him but he might not know
me. I looked at your past posts - many of them were filled with
claims saying that you know about James Phang, that he smokes Salem
etc. So?? 
People will
believe you more after that?
4) If you are a MLMer, you should know better. Anyway, thanks for
your point here, which is exactly what I meant above - "Why!? In my
life, only two people has ever question my honesty and integrity.
One is a bastard whom everyone avoid. And the other....Typical
sceptical Singaporean."
So by saying this, you are such an honest-to-goodness guy and
chock-full of integrity? I am not questioning your integrity here
but rather your identity in question. Proclaiming that I have
certain qualities does not mean that I really have them. That was
my earlier point too.
5) Relax pal, I was answering someone else's comment. No need to
get defensive over this. If I were responding to your comments,
then I would have quoted you, wouldn't I? 
I was
replying in general.
6) Did I say you ranted? 
7 ) Whoa cool it. I was pointing out the flaws in your argument. I
never thought of you that way, so please do not assume. You said
yourself, assumptions the mother of screw-ups. "Seventh, if you
chose to put me as overzealous blind guy, (I guess as much) go
ahead. "
Overzealous blind guy? Then I wouldn't have bothered replying. I
was hoping you could clarify yourself instead of assuming that
people are out to get you.
8 ) "I am also not suprised at your post. Didnt I hint in the
preceding post that post like yours would come up? Just as I
forecasted last year that going by my observation of my friend, he
would join in a get rich quick scheme"
Wow. When you wrote your posts, you expected posts like mine to
come up, so you 'bulletproofed' everyone against such posts? And
when posts as such do come up, and since you already know that this
would happen, you would be the indisputable winner? I have to hand
it to you, Oracle.
And you can forecast too?? Then you can be a fortune-teller! And by
saying so, that would increase your credibility rather drastically,
wouldn't it? Good work.
This is immature. I too can say that
I'll be expecting you to reply to this post with blah blah blah but
I wouldn't expect so many suckers out there to fall for this.
All in all, I would just like to remind you that since you are in
the MLM industry, you should protect your own industry. Prove your
company's worth to win others over, rather than shooting others
down, else they would return in kind (perhaps which is why up till
now you have not posted which MLM company you are in). Since you
seem to know many MLM respectable figures, do ask one with
experience and he will tell you the same thing.
Your informative articles are good, but there are areas where you
need evidence to back it up. Of course, I expect you might reply
somewhat belligerently, but I really hope you can consider what I
said in the paragraph above, no offence meant.
In the meantime, Happy Chinese New Year to you and everyone else
too!! 
