NUS students enjoy gay sex and rapes the mouths of innocent
teenage boys in HDB lifts.
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_373074.html
A NATIONAL University of Singapore undergraduate who allegedly
molested three teenage boys in Housing Board lifts
near their homes appeared in court yesterday to face charges.
Andy Lee Kee Liang, 24, is also charged with performing oral sex on
one of the boys, and forcing him to perform the same act on
him.
Lee claimed trial to five charges – two each of aggravated
molestation and unnatural sex and one of attempted outrage of
modesty – committed in August and September 2007.
He elected to remain silent when Community Court Judge Roy
Neighbour called for his defence, claiming he was of unsound mind
at the time of the offences.
In a statement of agreed facts, Deputy Public Prosecutor Isaac Tan
recounted Lee’s acts.
The first victim was a 14-year-old boy, whom Lee followed from an
MRT station to his block of flats on Aug 30 that year.
At the lift lobby, Lee exposed himself to the boy, then got into
the lift with him.
He positioned himself in front of the victim, put his hands on his
shoulders and kissed him on the lips. He also
groped his private parts.
Filled with fear, the victim struggled and tried
unsuccessfully to free himself.
Lee then knelt down and performed fellatio on the
victim. He continued molesting him and stopped
only when an elderly man entered on the eighth floor as
the lift was going down.
Lee then followed the victim out, held onto his
shoulder and led him to a staircase landing where he
directed the boy to perform fellatio on him.
Five days later, he struck again and molested a 15-year-old
boy by similarly kissing him in a lift.
Lee subsequently pulled down his shorts and exposed
himself.
A week later, another 14-year- old boy was walking
home from the same MRT station when he sensed someone following
him.
Lee followed the victim into the lift, but failed to molest or
touch the boy, who managed to push him away.
As a result of investigations, Lee was arrested at his home
three days later.
Judge Neighbour granted the prosecution’s application for the
victims’ names and details to be withheld. But he dismissed an
application by Lee’s lawyer, Mr Foo Cheow Ming, for his client’s
name not to be published.
Objecting, DPP Tan said the order – under the Subordinate Courts
Act – was usually made to safeguard the interests of certain
witnesses, in particular young and vulnerable victims of crime,
such as those in this case.
“Clearly such an order is intended to prevent undue embarrassment
for the victims or to heap additional trauma on them,” he
said.
There was no reason, he added, to preclude the particulars of Lee
from being disclosed. Furthermore, his name had been published
previously in media reports.
A defence psychiatrist will take the stand today to testify on
Lee’s state of mind at the time.
[email protected]
