I don't see how homosexuality negatively affects society or
straight people. Why do straight people have to discriminate
against homosexuals in order for them to live their lives?
Homophobia is similar to racism in the 20th century,
particularly with White/Black people in the US. There were seperate
drinking fountains, Black people were forced to sit in the back of
the bus, etc. Eventually, racism became considered politically
incorrect, but more importantly, morally wrong. However, many
less-developed societies still hold these prejudices, whether it
may be against a certain race or a certain group of people.
Also, from your previous post, I interpreted it to say that
homosexuality is genetic, since you were talking about evolution
and natural selection. Personally, I don't know what causes
homosexuality, but I don't think it's a choice, much like how
straight people don't choose to be attracted to the opposite
sex.
I had sought to avoid such topics, but i guess one can't hide from
it, more so with so much ignorance being trump up, churning my
stomach to the depths!
You had desecrated and profaned nobles ideals by aligning
your filthy lifestyle choice with it. I will attempt forwith to be
as gracious as possible, since it is what I would have expect
others to do similarly so.
Liberty for womanhood and enfranchisement from slavery are noble
aims that perpetrate humanity and the human race. Your fight has
nothing noble and will only doom mankind with your lifestyle
choice.
As with parellalisms, you and many others foolishly chosed
nobles ones, which are far from the ideals of which your group set
to achieve. Allow me to show you a parallelsim that is more closer
to your lifestyle choice.
Smoking had been with us for ages. No one knew of its bad
effects, but with the advance of science, we realized it this
century and had sought to eradicate it. It causes cancer later in
one's life and as well as the financial savings for medical cure,
not to mention the unnecessary loss of one precious life to
societies.
But did we ban smoking? No, we didnt, because many are stuck on
this habit. Societies understood the hazards of smoking as well as
the difficulty to cure it, thus it needs time to fully eradicate
smoking.
As such, smokers still had the right to smoke, but only in
specific areas. And they must not influence others to join them in
their LIFESTYLE choice, espacially the young. Is this an
infringement to their rights? Should smokers form a lobby and
demand they be allowed to smoke as they please, or others to be
tolerant of them, or let them influence the young to join their
crusade to continue to smoke, knowing full well it is a destructive
habit to oneself and society?
While homosexuality will not cause cancer, it does even worse -
destroy the family, societies and civilisation.
But you homosexuals, have a right to exist as humans, just don't
attempt to promote your 'values' to others, and stay away from
decent families, the way smokers do.
Another foolish and absurb concept to support the homosexual way
of life as correct is to compare themselves to celibate monks and
priests.
Their understanding of economics is sorely limited, but cannot
be blamed for not everyone is educated on that subject. However,
simple logic will dictate their theory invalidated because a
society can only support x numbers of monks/priests.
So in the event if everyone or half becomes monks/priests - who
will work the fields and manage trade? Such an economic order do
not exists and have never before in the history of mankind. Simply
because even our cavemen ancestors understood such concepts.
But can half the world be made up of heterosexuals and
homosexuals? Most definately in this liberat day and age,
because sexual conduct do not inhibits work performances. The
dammage will only come later, when heterosexuals adults die out,
their
children will end up supporting half the society's
population made of old and aged homosexuals.
Worse if the entire society becomes homosexual. The end cannot
be too far away. Think, my fellow human, whom I still respect as a
human, before you press your lifestyle choice upon us all and
espacially insidiously, to our naive and innocent
children .
