Then that would be a long wait or impossible I have bible at
all. I have given away all bibles. This is
just fundamental that christians should know about premarital
sex.
ok... so i take it that you're not a christian, yet you seem
confident that the bible have a stand against taking sensual
photographs. to be able to "quote" it so effeciently too.
lol 
oh. i wasn't talking about premarital sex. we were NEVER ONCE
talking about premarital sex. or at least, i wasn't.
like you said, the stand for a christian regarding premarital
sex is a clear cut one. so it should occur to you that i would
never bother to discuss about that with you.
that's why i talked about the photography.
in fact, you yourself condoned the act of premarital sex, but it
appears that they crossed the line for you, when they took
photographs of each other.
Originally posted by qlqq9:
If they want to have sex, go ahead but if they take the photos
of the lovemaking then they have to take the risk it will be
very possible to be exposed one day, which it did. Both
edison and those female artistes are consenting to the phototaking
so no pain, I don't pity them for they ask for it.
so now you're singing a different tune? telling me about what
the bible said, and your zealous pov?
hypocrite?
why do you think i was curious to why you would be ok for them
to have sex and affairs, but it offends you that they took videos
and pictures of themselves as part of their sex lives?
that's why again, i felt that taking pictures of themselves in
itself is not morally or ethically wrong. if it was a legally
married couple doing it. it would seem ok isn't it?
so please, next time, think for 5 minutes before you post stuff
like "incur the wraths of others", because i certainly am not
afraid of incuring the wrath of babbling fools who quote verses out
of nowhere.
He does not know what is right and what is wrong. He
not christian leh, you talked to him about bible. According
to the bible, it is definitely a sin lah.
can you hear the soft murmurs of "where?
where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with mutual consent
of your beloved is a sin? where?" in the background? brushing aside
the lack of evidence with a "sorry ah.. i dumped all my bibles
already, so you go ask someone else" and happily patting your
backside, just don't cut it for me.
and by the way, you haven't answered my question regarding if it
is a "sin" if it was a legally married couple who took photos and
videos of each other in lovemaking.
"where? where the bible say taking erotic photograghs with
mutual consent of your beloved is a sin? where.....?"
*wind blowing*
btw. the difference between being pure and being a prude is
this:
being pure: making sure you don't fall in
sexual sins. and if others fall, you caringly guide them back on
the right track, never condemning them and covering them in love
against the shame they endured, so that they will grow from the
experience. so that in turn, they can be a shelter for others who
are going through the same issues.
being prudish: making sure others don't fall in
sexual sins. and if they do, critisize and condemn them like crazy.
making sure they pay for it with the rest of their lives and never
be able to live their lives ever again, and forever reminding them
of their wrongdoing with a everytime you see them.
and the way i see it. you, my dear, are a prude. and a graceless
one at that.
