Goal.com correspondent argues that Englands problem is that the
players start to believe the hype of their blinkered media
Did you think England could win the World Cup? Was it because the
Premiership is 'the best league in the world'?
Sky Sports have a lot to answer for. While they provide coverage
that is visually excellent and technically superb, they are
responsible consciously or perhaps unconsciously for shaping the
views of the young football fan and the general football viewing
public. Hear and see something said enough times, and the chances
are you will start to beleive it!
Sky Sports have a lot to answer for. While they provide coverage
that is visually excellent and technically superb, they are
responsible consciously or perhaps unconsciously for shaping the
views of the young football fan and the general football viewing
public. Hear and see something said enough times, and the chances
are you will start to beleive it!
Since the conception of the Andy Gray and Richard Keyes combination
the viewer has been told the Premier League is the best in the
World. Initially this was a marketing plan but now they even
believe it themselves. Now, and all through the tournament they -
and not just Keyes and Gray - but almost every English media pundit
out there, has been looking for someone to blame. Instead of
realising that their own views are in fact wrong, they turn and
turned on the easy targets: the foreigner Sven, and the man who
plays his football abroad, Beckham
The majority of the media would have us believe that Steven
'Hollywood' Gerrard is the best midfield player in the world. There
is no doubt the man can play, but surely a player who misplaces so
many passes can't be considered truly great? Without the
footballing brain to know when to keep it simple, Gerrard can never
be ranked among the worlds best. Time and time again he tries the
game-breaking pass, which throughout the World Cup resulted in a
mere 50/50 ball. In the Premier League Gerrard looks superb; this
is because he has a magnificent shooting ability and a great
engine. Put the Liverpool captain in Spain or Italy and his
technique would fall short.
Frank Lampard, the other player the media would have us believe is
world class, is another midfielder who lacks technique on the world
stage. With Claude Makelele sitting behind him he can rove around
the midfield for Chelsea and this is the reason he gets so many
goals. In a nuts and bolts league he will shine because his
technique is not called upon aside from when he shoots. Because
these two players score so many goals they are lauded as the best,
but they are not complete and it has been shown in this World Cup.
When teams like Ecuador can hold the ball better than an English
midfield what is the overriding message?
Frank Lampard thinks he deserves more respect then he's been given
after he missed his penalty. He obviously thinks very highly of
himself considering he showed himself up in every single game that
he played. Perhaps its time viewers analysed him and Gerrard? They
never seem to take any criticism. Steven Gerrard can get away with
knee high challenges and giving the ball away 20 times in a single
game, but no one dares breathe a word of criticism. David Beckham
has been abused by press all over England, Ireland and everywhere
else despite being the only player other than Owen Hargreaves who
really contributed to the results of the games. While he was far
from outstanding in the tournament, without his dead balls England
would not have gotten out of their group.
The fact is that the English Premier League has pace and aggression
but it falls short technically. In the aftermath Keyes asks Gray
would there be any players you would swap from the English team
with the teams still in the tournament? Gray reluctantly responds
'Maybe Buffon, Henry maybe?' The Premiership is that good Andy? A
fit Rooney and Ashley Cole are the only two players that could stay
in the England side.
Of course Terry is a far better player then Cannavaro, as is
Ferdinand over Thuram. Terry has won two Premier League titles, and
dont forget its the best league in the world. Also it's not
necessary to mention how Makelele was sitting in front of him all
that time. Neville is far superior in every way to Zambrotta and
Sagnol.
Vieira according to the media is past it and had a poor season for
those who don't watch Italian football, that is why Fabio Capello
signed him and Juve won the inferior Serie A title. Makelele
doesn't get a mention, and well Ballack is German. Why even discuss
Zidane, Pirlo, Totti, Deco, Figo......none of them could get into
the England team.
The point is not that the English players are poor footballers, far
from it. It's just they are not as good as we are led to believe.
Mentally England buckle under the pressure, there is no need to
develop that theory. Technically, they cannot match the other
nations. Players can run around the park until the cows come home
but if they can't pass and keep the ball, winning and playing
attractive football is never going to happen. It doesnt matter who
the manager is, England have not been attractive for the last few
generations and they won't be for the next.
Gavin Dunne (Premier League Correspondent)