Originally posted by HafizulKMS:
Are you guys trying to say Chelsea spent most to get the
[b]BEST players in the world?
Does that mean all players Chelsea has are best in the
WORLD? So does that mean SWP is much much
BETTER than Nistelroy/Rooney and etc.?
But if Rooney is better than Drogba, does that mean Man U also
spending lots to buy the BEST OF THE BEST, but
only can win NUTS?
So if Chelsea can spent money for EVERY BEST
players in the world, does they already got Stevie and
Joaquin?
Use you common sense la. Anyway, whenever Man U fans tell me,
Chelsea won is because they spent, then how about Man U, they won
is not because they spent? Really made me feel like they are sore
losers.
Wakakakakaka~~~ so?[/b]
Man Utd is able to spend cos they earn the money through their
hardwork to make what they are today. Not becoming an overnight
rich club like Chelsea. Other clubs are careful when spending on
players, unlike Chelsea. Chelsea the main spoiler of the transfer
market.
