Hey guys, be matured and rational in a topic. Dun say things
like "go ask yr mum", "go see doctor", etc when a convincing answer
could not be given.
1) First we hv to be clear whether incest results in "having baby".
If yes,
personally I think it's not so good based on medical and moral
reasons for the offspring..
Dun argue abt "moral", saying that ppl set the rules and one place
is different from another. But the fact is that in the whole world,
ppl of different races have the same rules really means something
so ancient that we cannot explain or deny some truth abt it (like
when u see a baby thrown down the buidling, why should u feel
cruel? though some defiance ppl may say shiok).
2) If there is no baby, juz thrill or affection, then it is very
arguable for some I think. Frankly, some teenagers may hv peeped
their sisters bathing or changing because of curiousity and growing
urge. While peeping your neighbour's daughter may be sued, peeping
yr own sister when caught is almost always pardonable. Why?
So tis boils down to, is incest (without baby) being commited
because it is part of growing-up urge, or is it done by a person
delibrately out to defile someone or some rules without any feeling
involved.
This to me would be the point to argue.
