Originally posted by Chewbacca:
good story....but is this for real, sounds suspicious
here:s why some parts are convincing while some r not
Convincing parts: Timeline and setting in 1992, yeah during this
period and before there were widespread mediums in Singapore,
Chinese , Indian and Malays.And the ladies during this period and
before were actually unfaithful as many of them were just O level
educated and from the baby boomer generation.Plus Singapore society
had been moderately plagued with such problems since the 80s and
carried over over to the early 90s and suspicious info...Also that
him mum shrugs off with giggles and laughter when the men make
their advances seem to point to a insecure and gullible
woman..Another thing to note is that he stated his mum was in her
late 20s,He 13 which means he was born to his mum when she still
very young at 15 or 16 which seem probable at the time when girls
get married off early
Unconvincing parts: The way sexual acts had been described sounds
like coming from someone plagued by peversion.Makes the whole thing
sound like an erotic story borrowed from a sex website.
Verdict: If this story is false cause a person who may been
psychologically affected by such a trauma would not go so deep in
describing his experience so indepth to the point it become
perversion.On the other hand it could be true if the individual
hates his mother and psychologically conditioned with negative
beliefs about life and people.He begins to ravel in these negative
environment doing and saying things in the same light.Further more
what is convincing could be also unconvincing in the fact that it
could all be made up to perfection
This story is probably false
[b]Dont kid me dude, i have a cert in psychology[/b]
thanks for ur last sentence in bold, saved me time from reading
the post. 
