quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the girls, I tot i said very clearly. It is said that
(statistically proven) girls will at least get an infection of some
kind (on their privates) once in their lifetime.
It is also a fact that most uncircumcised males do not have hygene
or infection problems as opposed to popular believes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never heard that before...well now I know. At least you know the
reason for circumcision *phew* .
Before I get misunderstood, lets just
say circumcision, male or female, is NOT the solution to infection.
Female circumcision has met with even more fierce objection and is
considered a very cruel act.
I'm quite unwilling to talk about the convenant part 'cause it my
explanations may offend the Christians...
And about the uncircumcised males thing...the popular belief is
actually that they are more prone to get an infection, not
"confirmed that they will get unless they circumcise".
IF all guys WILL get infection if they don't shed the foreskin,
then guys world-wide would be circumcising!=pPp.
Yup, like i said, it is only an
'assumption', with no statistical evidence to back it up. Also, i'm
not saying 'ALL guys will get infection' too. Rather I'm saying
most who did not circumcise did not get any
infection at all. So the term 'more prone' is highly arguable,
since most people didnt get infection anyway. If this is the case,
then why prevent something that is so rare? It's just as good as
shaving every single person's head bald just so to prevent
spreading of head lice. The end result is very similar - you do
something that affects alot of people to prevent the rare occurence
of some infection, and finally, you might reduce the occurence but then on
the other hand, introduce other problems.
As for the convenant part, me being the ever curious guy 
, can we talk in PM, or
better yet exchange email addr so we can discuss/share info?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The story about Charles Darwin is one of the most CRAP and
underhand strategies used by Creationists and religious people to
MISLEAD people, solely becoz his Theory of Evolution was running
against what was in their religious scriptures - that Mankind
evolved from animals. Please take note that the rumour about Darwin
denying his own theory is COMPLETELY UNTRUE = This is what happens
when people blindly follow or listen to others without checking it
out themselves.
Evolution is a FACT and it is happening as we speak, whether u like
it or not, whether there is God or not. Denying it is as good as
'refusing to acknowledge your very existence'.
Those interested in the scientific answers and rebuts of rumours
and doubts can visit http://talkorigins.org/ (i'm sure most
questions are answered there).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's just one problem about the Darwin thing. It's confusing if
you ask me. Some say what you said, but others oppose, and say that
he really did deny the theory at his deathbed.
It's not confusing if u ask me. Say all
your life u've been working on a breakthru formula which u have
struggled against all odds, even almost died for it. Do u think the
chance is high that you will just suddenly, at ur deathbed, DENY
your own lifetime work which u strongly believed to be true, and to
deny it straight with no known reason? Bare in mind, Darwin is a
scientist, rational reasoning is in his nature.
Anyway, the point is - it doesnt really matter! Why?
Ok, lets just take it that
he DID deny his own work. So does that matter? No. How come? Becoz
Evolution is part of nature - it is a natural phenomenon, there are
so many overwhelming evidence to support it. So what if a person
(even Darwin for that matter) denies it? It doesnt make nature go
away. Just like if Newton rejects the law of Gravity, it doesnt
make gravity go away. It's here to stay, whether u like it or not.
The only scientific explanation available for the existence of the
world is the Big Bang. I think it's too miraculous for things to
exist in such proportion, but that is what I think.
It's the same as Poopie-Head's belief that a god can't exist, but
it's his opinion. We can discuss this, but I don't think the forum
is suitable. The thread will most likely turn into
religion-bashing/no-religion bashing. Explanations are easily
misinterpreted too.
Anyway, evolution happening now? So far, nothing has evolved. In
case we DO evolve, let's take a picture of ourselves so that the
future generations can check if they did=P
There really is no solution to the marriage. It just won't work
out. People tried it before (yes, that means the muslim broke the
Islamic law), and the kids ended up screwed up.
Big Bang, Evolution, etc are separate
fields in science, so it is better to view them separately. Like I
said, big events like Big Bang, etc should be broken down and
looked at separately and in detail before we are able to start to
understand its nature. Dont jump to conclusions just by looking at
the surface. For example, to solve a very complex mathematics
question, we need to look at each part separately and break it down
to smaller parts. We can never solve a complex problem just by
looking at the problem at the surface level. We can discuss this
privately if u want. 
And what do u mean 'the kids ended up screwed up'? Pls
elaborate?
The non-muslim has to convert if the Musim girl stays a
Muslim, which means that she continues to follow Islamic
law.
That sums it up pretty well.
