God does not force you to marry into Islam. He gives you the
power of reasoning and freewill. If it is fated for the guy to
marry the Muslim girl, the guy will one day 'realize' and he will
use his gift of freewill to do right. I speak from experience .
Just a question, if an other religion (die die do not believe in
muslim) guy and a gal loves each other a lot and die die need to
marry, wat r the option available to them ? From the viewpoints I
came out with the following possible option
1, Don't marry
2, Guy convert (even though he die die do not believe in
muslim)
3, Girl convert but will result in a serious backlash
the fourth option, guys stay as his religion and girl stay as her
is not really avaliable if u r under strict muslim laws.
I heard from some rumours tat if a muslim decide to renounce her
faith, her family had to disown her as a daughter... is tat true
?
The medical science finds that there is a risk for various
diseaseas
the pig is found to be a host for many parasites and potential
diseases.
I have talked about tis in speakers corner before. If muslim
wanna ban pork because the scripture says so, then i have nothing
to say. But if u ban pork because u deemed it to be a health
hazard, then I can tell u it is wrong and pork is as safe as other
meat sources. Tis is particularly true since pigs r being reared in
conditions similar to the rearing of cows and sheeps. Look at the
chinese and japanese, who had ate pork all their lives. They r the
ones tat had lived the longest isn't it ?
How do you know whether it's an evolved species or a different
species? It could always have been a whole different species that's
extinct!
How about tis then.
http://www.nmsr.org/nylon.htm
It spoke of the discovery of a bug tat digest nylon ? It is well
known tat nylon is invented by men only after 1930's. How come
there r bugs tat can and only digest nylon now ?
Dinosaurs evolved? They could also have been something totally
different. A different creature. Why is it that they have to evolve
to become their so-called ancestors today? Why deny the possibility
that they are a different group of creatures that have been
extinct?
It is because we can see gradual changes from time to time of
these creatures becoming closer and closer to the species we look
at now. There had been many many sites found and they all suggest a
gradual but ertain change to the animals we see today.
Another interesting fact about evolution is if a bone, such as a
modern crocodile was found in the age of dinosaurs, then tis would
be enough to prove the theory of evolution wrong. However tis sort
of evidence was never found.
Do u really believe there a species of crocodile all directly and suddenly extinct, then
out of the blue suddenly
popped up a new species of crocodile with enough number for
continuing the line tat resembles much to the previous crocodile.
(tis must be true. Otherwise a more modern crocodile bones would
have been discovered in the past) Tis sudden extinction and sudden
appearing of crocodiles have to occured for a few hundred species
in order to give us the evidences we see today. If u ask me, it is
much highly likely these crocodiles experience a change over the
years
It is like seeing pictures of a girl growing up. U can either
believe tat it is the same girl tat change and grow up, or believe
tat all the pictures r different girls, and they die suddenly and
another girl tat resembles to her suddenly popped up. (which is why
a picture of an older girl never appears at the age when she was
young and vice versa. Much like the bones found) Which is more
believable ? Tis analogy is on accepting evidences of changes over
time, which include growing up and evolution.
If u believe tat these r a group of animals tat have been extinct,
u still have to acknowledge tat modern crocodiles only popped up in
recent years which meant tat all animals was not created in a
single day.
And how's this for evidence-Noah's ark was found somewhere in
Iraq. They tested to see how old the wood was (using DNA ageing or
something like that to trace it). The wood really was as old as
estimated to be.
Why don't u post us a website on tis discovery ? Someone had
mentioned about a dustbowl tat was supposed to be noah's ark before
but upon further study from sceintist, it is pronounced to be just
a natural dust bowl. Even the website of christian answers
acknowledge tis fact
"Poopie-Head", does a tadpole evolve into a frog? Does a
caterpillar evolve into a butterfly? In appearance the 'baby' is
totally dissimilar from its adult shape.
I think u r probably thinking the scientists tat studied these
bones to be morons or something... Does a frog grow to be a few
hundred metres high (link it with dinosaurs) ? Does a giraffe have
a short neck ? no matter how old a frong is, they will never grow
to be tat big. No matter how small a giraffe is, they will never
have a short neck comapred with proportion to their body. However
these bones r found. How do u explain tat ?
