Hi,
why can't the motorcycle stop in time? -> cause it can't see
the joker stopping.
Have you driven a motorcycle b4? Cars have fours wheels, more
weight/stability and of course, it is able to handle the impact
better than a motorcycle better even if the motorcycle is driving @
a slower speed.
Please, don't co-relate young, reckless motorists with this
case, this only cloud judgement and stops you from being
impartial.
if the joker's action were so right, why did the car behind also
hit him?
Imagine going @ centre lane of an expressway, and you see a car
suddenly, turning on his hazard lights, and slowed @ 20km/h, and
you were from 90km/h, you have time to stop/ebrake? what if
the vehicle behind is a heavy 5 toner?
This joker comes out of car, and said "I forgot to put cash-card
la. " Not even asking how you are and apologetic.
What you do? Come out of car, and shake his hand and say, "what,
the vehicle behind blur, never see you on hazard lights meh??"
Hi,
Why did the 1st fucker stop and 2nd fucker didn’t even hit his
rear? → 2 has super fucking electric human reaction? 2 is a super
duper fantabuloso driver? Or did 2 keep a safe distance? You mean
he is plain fucking heng is it?
Excuse the language, my point is there is room for questions. I’m
not launching personal attacks on all motorcyclists.
If 2 hits 1, then it’s inevitable for 3 to hit 2, that is what we
call a chain accident caused by one single fucker in front.
But why did the 2 stop in time but 3 slam into the rear windscreen
and got flung off? What about 4? Why didn’t 4 hit 3?
Of course 3 cannot see 1 but 3 can see 2 right? If 3 cannot see 2
then are you telling me 4 cannot see 3, 5 cannot see 4. Wouldn’t
the whole traffic system in Singapore go haywire with an island
full of blind motorists on the highway day in and out? What sort of
argument is this?
No I am not a motorcyclist and I'm not one for good reasons.
True cars can handle impact better. From the report you read, what
physical impact due to direct front condition did vehicle 2 and
driver 2 sustain? Even if minor compared to the trauma and broken
bones sustained by 3?
Did 2 hit 1? Can you clarify where you got that information?
My point is, many things can be para phrased, taken out of
context with very selective quotes. It won't hurt to question why
scenarios were painted in one single stroke.
