Whoever who wants to use data to analyse and like chickenlittle2
keep on defending SLBP… I see how you’re going to
defend SLBP’s horrible acts…
SLBP is like SMRT’s SPH,
only think of money… Dunno how to solve the problem… Today I’m
going to expose chickenlittle2’s defence which is all baseless… Cos
SLBP dunno what’s going on… anyhow operate the
buses…
Dun say abt exams first…Slowly going to shame whoever that has
been defending SLBP…
1) 179A not making money: Sometimes whenever feedback is sent
over 179A is not operated for PM peak, the subsequent few days
SLBP come with pattern… “SLBP will handle it”... In
reality SLBP know nuts about demand management…
Sometimes when the email is sent, SLBP next day
chut pattern… Sometimes schedule the 179A to be bunching up [2x]
dispatched together from 27281… and they’ll time it to be right
behind 179 [Dun think people dunno… about tabulating
runtime]...
Some days, the 179A all starts from 27231…
I thought to begin with, 179A is 50:50 dispatch from both 27281
and 27231?
And when I mentioned about South Spine.. Next day all 179A
starts from 27231…
Let me say this la.. chickenlittle2 can deny for all he wants..
but already exposed… When I feedback to people at SBST
over 179A in Aug 2010 and soon the downroute of 179A was made..
soon SLBP act smart thinking how come Braddell
suddenly make downroute… and soon most of the 179A start from 27231
thinking it’s a new demand?
The problem at South Spine was there for years and it only took
my suggestion for the matter to be resolved? What on earth
SLBP has been doing on the past few years?
Only know how to manipulate things… decent things dun want to
follow and do…
2) Downroute: How come 96B got downroute operated as stipulated,
SLBP keep on refusing to operate 179A properly…
3) Exam Sat slot: There was once 179A was operated on Sat.. But
SLBP went on to chut pattern… BNL
Timekeeper tell people 179A not operated on the 2nd slot from Boon
Lay.. only downroute from NTU…
Tell people the poster printed wrongly… Big liar!
Nonsense! I checked with people at Braddell and verified
SLBP chut pattern… End up company dispatched the bus
to waste by SLBP… No wonder chickenlittle2 keep on
saying 179A not making money.. cos anyhow operate…
Not even complying to company’s rule… Woah…
4) Today’s mess: 179A SLBP simply refused to
operate properly… Freq was at 7 – 8 mins per bus…
End up next time, thanks to the slow clearance.. people began
queuing for 179… Next thing which I’m not surprised, people along
Pioneer Rd Nth found it hard to board the bus.. Even at 0830, the
boarding mess and underops was still there… Exam was supposed to
start at 0900…
Yeah now 179 very profitable.. but people late for exam… And
I’ve followed up this matter to LTA…
BusAnalyser can say 179 more dispatch… But does he saw what
happened at Boon Lay? End up the bottleneck was at Boon Lay cos
nearly everyone alighted at Boon Lay today for some
MRT trips…
and like I’ve said.. SLBP dunno how to operate 179…
179A runtime is so much shorter, can turnaround faster with
deploying lesser buses…
But only think of “profits”... squeezing people… bus tiao at
Pioneer Rd Nth as BC try to get as many people to board [upper deck
still got some seat though]... lambat here, lambat there..
people late for exam…
As mentioned, have already highlighted this matter to
LTA… See what chickenlittle2 still want to talk big
about profit and loss…
Sorry, I still think that operating more 179 is a better option
for all (including students and residents along JW st 63). In fact,
179 is already running at a very good frequency then many other
feeder bus services.
As mentioned earlier, deploying more 179A would only penalise
students boarding along JW st 63 and Pioneer Rd North. Again,
personally I witnessed many empty 179A buses while the 179 buses
were very packed during the PM peak.
Please dont be selfish. In fact, the PM peak trips for 179A should
be removed.
