Sure, no prob!
To Reddressman:
1. the price of a honda civic type r seems comparable if not
more expensive than a WRX ?
CTR is more expensive than a WRX 5dr version. But is cheaper
than a 4 dr (sedan) STI tuned WRX.
WRX has a notorious image as a ah beng car. But what is your
definition of sports car? A CTR is more a track ready car than a
WRX. That means that a stock CTR can do well on a track, whereas a
stock wrx needs better performing aftermarker parts to make it more
track-friendly. Its all personal preference.
CTR is a NA whereas a WRX is Turbocharged.
thanks Dare2Kill :)
you seem well informed. As for me, i am just a layman.
what i meant was, WRX is known for its world rally championship
and its abilities. As for Honda, even it may also be doing
something like that, the impresssion to layman is that its not
really a world rally famous car right?
its common on the roads but to me , a pure layman, my impression
is that it is a common category kinda sporty car but not the real
sports car. like when u see a WRX, u cannot say it is not a
sports car. whereas Honda seems like a family car with a bit of
sporty look.
So i wanted to find out why the price I see on newspaper seems
comparable between the 2. specifically, why people would pay so
much for honda when WRX is clearly the more real sports car? with
no offence intended to Honda luvers. just being direct and
honest.