SUSPECT
SBS6226C
[ HGDEP 27 ] > [ HGDEP 325 ]
SBS920X SBS973T SBS1907D SBS1997T
[ HGDEP 325 ] > [ HGDEP SP ]
SBS964U SBS2666S
[ HGDEP 112/325* ] > [ HGDEP 112 ]
SBS6238T**
[ HGDEP 112 ] > [ HGDEP 112/325* ]
** = Does full crossover. Not 2 supplementary trips like SBS964U
and SBS2666S.
325 fleet :
Feeder 325 [ WAB ] ( 7 -
8 Buses ) (December)
SBS1937S SBS2656X
2 Volvo B10M MkIV [ 2 Strider ]
SBS6147Y SBS6148U SBS6149S SBS6226C SBS6308A
5 Mercedes Benz O530 Citaro
AM/PM Crossover from 112
:
SBS6238T
1 Mercedes Benz O530 Citaro
Please stop imaginating kiddy things that are unlikely to
happen.
So... after the three perms you went all crazy and start to
think all these stuff... your own childish suspects that aren't
even supposed to cross your mind.
Ok. Firstly, SBS deploy the Citaros there NOT for WAB
conversion, otherwise my dear 372 would have been WAB long ago.
They are just to make sure the services with older fleets get at
least a WAB so that to keep up with the standards.
And because of this, please NEVER be so stupid to think that SBS
will deploy a WAB from a WAB, load-traumatic service to a non-WAB
feeder. Ever went into your mind which bus can actually replace
6226C when it is redeployed? The other SP Citaros and KUBs around
have better things to do.
Also, may I ask how many crossover days 6238T had did on 325
consecutively? Why must crossovers be WAB? It only does a few trips
anyways. I have also been seeing 6238T as usual during evening peak
also.
