61-DD friendly
67-anti DD
75-anti DD
77-anti DD
106-DD friendly
167-DD friendly
169-DD friendly
171-anti DD
172-anti DD
173-anti DD
176-anti DD
177-anti DD
178-anti DD
180-DD friendly
184-anti DD
187-DD friendly
188-DD friendly
189-DD friendly
190-DD friendly
300-feeder 302-feeder 307-feeder
700-anti DD
800-feeder 804-feeder 806-feeder 811-feeder 812-feeder
529/825-anti DD
851-DD friendly
852-anti DD
853-anti DD
854-DD friendly
855-DD friendly
856-DD friendly
857-DD friendly
858-anti DD
859-DD friendly
860-feeder
882-anti DD
900,901,902,903,911,912,913-feeder
920,922-feeder
925-anti DD
926-anti DD
927-anti DD
941,945,947-feeder
950-anti DD
960-anti DD
961-anti DD
962-short distance route
963-anti DD
964-short distance route
965-DD friendly
966-DD friendly
969-DD friendly
970-anti DD
975-anti DD
980-anti DD
985-anti DD
A lot SMRT services anti-DD... Get the picture now? Don't be so
biased against 'em... Am I right SBS8501U/TIB1138M?
A lot of these services ply along DTL western wing. When DTL
opens, most of these services don't even need to use high capacity
buses. Some of the route might even be axed or shortern.
And some of these services are affected by low branches along
Dunearn Road. I would suggest LTA and NEA to work together to
relocate these low branch trees and replace them with high
branching trees, thus to allow double deckers to ply along the
road. It is such a waste that double deckers can't ply along that
stretch of road just because of low tree branches to provide a
better bus service overall.
Worse that because of this, many commercial vehicles as
well, especially large mobile cranes and container trucks have to
make a big detour just because of this. Wasting fuel and money for
companies.