Service 34 and 163 should get Citaros

SBS8676Z SG

I strongly agree with the thread starter.

Personally I feel that 163 is really a need for more new buses. I still remember 2 years back when 163 had 2/3 of new K230UBS in its fleet, furthermore full fleet K230UBs would appear on weekends. I enjoyed the fleet back then.

But what happen nowdays?? Just because 163 is NOT declared WAB, HGDEP somehow mistreated this service and downgrade back to those creepy MK3s.

Now with HGDEP taking in mass Citaros, I hope 163 will make a comeback to upgrade its fleet back. Why can't 163 get Citaros, instead of spamming around only on 101 and 109?? Is very unfair!

Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1) SG

Haha!! If get back the MK4s also i dont mind,i sure more than happy!!

Gus.chong SG

yes.. that the point brader.. like i say.. it need time to redeployment right?? one day the service will get the new bus .. correct or not brader?

It's not up to me to decide whether services will get the new bus (and hey, I don't even know which bus are you talking about). Maybe you should lodge a complaint to SBS Transit since your keyboard is fine, like what QX179R had said that SBS Transit did not reply SMB128B's multiple complaints is likely because of overusage of caps locks in typing reports to SBS Transit. And don't try to be funny with me by calling me 'brader'. If you want, when some other fans do things like what I typed in my quote, you may call them that, but wait until you call yourself that first.

Gus.chong SG

I strongly agree with the thread starter.

But what happen nowdays?? Just because 163 is NOT declared WAB, HGDEP somehow mistreated this service and downgrade back to those creepy MK3s.

Now with HGDEP taking in mass Citaros, I hope 163 will make a comeback to upgrade its fleet back. Why can't 163 get Citaros, instead of spamming around only on 101 and 109?? Is very unfair!

I can accept the reason why 109 have Citaro perms.

Gus.chong SG

fck lar

Svc 34 should get back MK2/MK3 lar

Right. I think when he rides on the service with those extremely 'slow and old' buses he will definitely be typing in more complaints with caps.

EW26 Lakeside SG

neh.. there's no need to complaint maa sbs transit maa.. there's still lots Citaro in C&C waiting for registered or some have been registered waiting to posting out to depot.. relax..

SBS8676Z SG

neh.. there's no need to complaint maa sbs transit maa.. there's still lots Citaro in C&C waiting for registered or some have been registered waiting to posting out to depot.. relax..

Most important factor is whether HGDEP will want to deploy Citaros on 163 or not. Regardless of how many Citaros HGDEP take, if HGDEP still neglect service 163 from deploying Citaros by then, it still doesn't make any difference, right?

CITARO LOV3R SG

OT abit, some time back there was a Wright cameo on 163.

EW26 Lakeside SG

yeapp.. thats right.. if put citaro on 163, den the old bus go out.. confirm some will say.. aww man i miss the old bus plying 163..

it the the matter of life and death xD

SBS8676Z SG

I can accept the reason why 109 have Citaro perms.

I hope HGDEP will evenly spread out all their Citaros to every services, eapecially those services that are yet to get an upgrade. Instead of spamming them only on 101 and 109.

SBS8676Z SG

yeapp.. thats right.. if put citaro on 163, den the old bus go out.. confirm some will say.. aww man i miss the old bus plying 163..

it the the matter of life and death xD

Look forward to see 804Z and 806T out soon. Hope these 2 gets replaced by either a Citaro or K230UB. No MK4s please.

Gus.chong SG

I hope HGDEP will evenly spread out all their Citaros to every services, eapecially those services that are yet to get an upgrade. Instead of spamming them only on 101 and 109.

I think you should hope that all depots spread out Citaros to every service then. As for 101 and 109, 101 is due to replacement, and 109 is due to WAB. 109 is reasonable to have a full WAB fleet currently, while the others with MK3 will not receive Citaros in order.

Gus.chong SG

Look forward to see 804Z and 806T out soon. Hope these 2 gets replaced by either a Citaro or K230UB. No MK4s please.

With your post I suspected something. Who are you? (No offence is taken)

sinicker SG

is SBS8676Z a "sane" version of SMB128B?

SBS5151R SG

I felt very pathetic for this place. Lock this topic please.

Gus.chong SG

is SBS8676Z a "sane" version of SMB128B?

No...I think he might be the one whose number on the registration plate is 1/4 than that of the person you said since he mentioned about 163.

nfshp253 SG

36 prolly not, look at the looping distance and the amount of break time, if any, when it returns to CGA. If Citaros go there, we would have "SBST's Chariots of Fire" next.

But 518 has Citaros too. That must be one of the longest journeys at around 50 kilometers!

CITARO LOV3R SG

But 518 has Citaros too. That must be one of the longest journeys at around 50 kilometers!

the amt of break time it receives at CGA might not be enough for the engine to cool... whereas for 518, at PSR, it has a longer break time... but anyways, its up to SBST whether they want to put Citaro on 36 or not...

Gus.chong SG

But 518 has Citaros too. That must be one of the longest journeys at around 50 kilometers!

I believe 518 is longer than 36.

SBS8676Z SG

Then explain why other WAB services like 43, 113 and 156 are not getting any Citaros to replace their remaining non-WABs? (43 used to have mass Citaros deployed 2 weeks ago but none were spotted lately). I believe 101 and 109 (plus some other Serangoon WAB services) are due to favoritism.

For services 27 and 34 they dun need any Citaros, the full fleet K230UBs are very good enough.

« Previous Page Next Page »