Not when you know who is calling the shots. Or simply being
persistent.
Ever wondered why 75 and 109 all Citaros? 60 and 241 all
Wrights?
A single email to the correct person, or sending hundreds of
emails about the same service is all it takes to convert a service
into all Wrights and Citaros.
I think your comment here needs some improvement. Firstly, you
need to refer to the Sgwiki Buses deployment page, ask around
others, and not rely on solely your own eyes.
Service 75 still has at least 4 Mercedes O405s being perm yeah,
while majority being Citaros. Not all Citaros in its perm
fleet.
Service 109 still has 8335H 8617U 8620J 8622D 8888D these 5
K230UBs in its perm fleet. Plus a Volvo Mk3 850P as perm too. How
can you anyhow whack it and say that "109 all Citaros"? It is
evidently not.
Service 241 has only a certain 7555X as a WRIGHT B9TL. 7470G
7482Y are ComfortDelgro B9TLs. Yes, there might be more Wrights now
on 241 nowadays, but as far as anyone knows, the perm fleet is not
all Wrights as you claim. Besides, 9334D & 9496U are Volvo
Olympians, not a Wright B9TL for goodness sake. So if you are
saying the 241 DD fleet is all Wrights, is your statement valid?
And there are other perm K230UBs on 241 also.
Service 60 still has 9262C. And please, there are still 8093E
8095A 8096Y 8097U 8098S 8101R these 6 perm Scania K230UBs. Not all
Wrights as you claim as well, even if you are talking about the DD
fleet.
And furthermore, why are you even bringing in Wrights into this
discussion? I was talking about K230s & Citaros, and you
suddenly bring in Wrights and claim that this service and that "all
Citaros" or "all Wrights", which are all proven to be wrong.
Lastly, your account was only registered in Nov 2011 (which i
assume is today) since your only single post so far is in this
thread, was in response to a possible flaming post by me (which i
have no intention to flame anyone, if you could hold your temper
& read each word carefully).
So what is the possibility of your account being a clone of someone
else here, which i might have actually triggered his self-defence
mechanism? I am only guessing, but the possibility is too high even
to the others yo.
Alas, I joined from Apr 2005, has 400+ valid posts with only 1
account & you with only 1 post so far in this account (which is
this thread) and possibly registered only today. (possibly holding
other accounts too since you know 75, 109, 60 & 241 so well).
So tell me, who is more likely the clone of someone else, and who
has more credibility? I am not being egoistic here, i am just
stating a plain fact.
So hold your temper, and don't smash your keyboard if you
are. 
