Double-deckers or bendies, It is not much of a difference, If
you feel comfortable with something, would you change it? Common
sense right?
Likewise even a service has 80% full day DDs and 20% SDs, If you
are a bunch lot of complaining peeps, I believe there is always
excuse to complain.
I can convert full of 67's fleet into bendies and people still
find it redundant.
I can subsitute 106 starting full day rigids all into split,
split bendies into full day starts and you people complain it's a
waste of space.
960's 5 full day rigid convert into split, in exchange for the 5
split bendies, Leaving 1 full day rigid, You can still not be
satisfied.
If 167 gets bendies, You people will still complain because
there isn't much bendies.
Go ahead and think, I won't go further beyond this line.
You keep saying that if SMRT bought DDs it would've solved the
problem. But have you ever thought of better ideas and restrictions
it might imply?
Well said, there's just so much ways to complain. Why only
rigid, why no dd, why so little bendy, why drive so slow, and why
frequency so instable, why frequency so long?
Why not look closer into the problem, analyze it in public and
find a solution to it, propose as a suggestion. Dont simply jump to
conclusion and say more DD or more bendy or better frequency will
help. It can be possible to run all services at 3min freq, with a
DD or bendy. But this wont recover even the cost to do it. A
balance needs to be found.
