i genuinely feel BNL Int parking allocation at end ons can be
improved. without switching services between sawtooth and
end-on
Current
174e
174e
174
174
246
246
79
79
30
30
249
249
154
154
252
252
198
198
251
251
157
157
Proposed
[249 - 1
[249
{174 - 2
{174
[174/174e -3
[30
{30 - 4
{30
[246 -5
[246
{79 - 6
{154
[154 - 7
[154
{198 - 8
{198
[252 - 9
[252
{157 -10
{157
{251 - 11
{251
[ and { denote parking lots belonging to a berth
1 - 249
2 - 174
3 - 174e
4 - 30
5 - 246
6 - 79
7- 154
8 - 198
9 - 252
10 - 157
11 - 251
actually this has been in my mind for quite some time. cos
i notice that all the sv30 and 154 buses do not have meal
break at Boon Lay cos of the current parking allocation
causing some drivers to eat at awkward times like 4pm and
830pm. With this setting, it can allow for mealbreak. sv157 is able
to contain mealbreaks at a better timeframe so
its not so bad but the new arrangment could see it share lots
at an easier rate. also, sv79 is a loop svc, while 174e
operates only 1 hour every morning, both wasting with 2
lots.
What do you guys think?
the new arrangement is better since it prevents wasting of lots
and since 154 does happen to have quite a bit of spillover. but I
forsee problems with the queue berths inside the interchange at the
30/174 part.
