So who says e SMRT OC500LE is user friendly? System
wise, had forseen will sooner or later kena complain one
In ytd's evening paper.
1 auntie complain tat e OC on 171 are not user friendly, as in
not enough bus stopping bells.
SMRT insist it's enough.
Let me say tis, it's all because the bells are fitted to e side.
Issue is not quantity, it's location. Vs location of bells inside e
KUBs.
For tis, OC500LE is clearly the most un-user friendly bus all
thks to e bell location. Standee no bell to press.
It's just like insisting everything on CCL's dwell time is OK
until they forgot it's a driverless system (EWL/ NSL can ting dong
on commuters before some lag time to close door, you think can be
done on CCL)?
