so at the first dun say no problem, i nv say no problem.
Occasionally it does happen should be the right way to talk abt it.
No depots and route are perfect. but I can see who is reacting fast
and put customer at the first place.
Service 154 do bunch up very often, so does that mean slbp and
brbp is perfect?
I dun see why I dun get an apologize from the starter.
problem is, you never highlight problems from slbp unless told
to, but would highlight problems from other depots without people
inviting you to do so.
however, the problem with sv24 weekends is not with jumpbus,
which is what we are discussing about. so, are you denouncing
jumpbus or simply services run by non-slbp depots and whatever
methods is use to operate the buses? i dun understand why a
discussion of jumpbus has to turn into finger pointing of depots
(again) when i've mentioned it's the problem of insufficient
running time? or have you decided to be an opportunist and abandon
the discussion to start attacking non-slbp services again just
because your fingers are itchy? do you think we're even attacking
slbp when we start proposing whether to have them jumpbus? then we
must be shooting ourselves in the foot to have so many jumpbus
services in the east! 
you mean he has to apologise for your typo? for anything else, if you deserve an apology you'd
have gotten it. i'm sure everybody here is friendly with everyone
else and would have no hesitation to do that.
