Introduction of SMRT Resort World shuttle RWS8 on 9 Jan 2010

last SG · 2010-01-07T20:02:02+00:00

But IF there's really such service and it's fully operated by OCs, I think I know where they will take the buses from.

sbst275 SG

Plying e congested Chinatown is beyond me.

As for running time, if SMRT can plan like tis for the svs under their area would win le

sbst275 SG

NR1 & NR6 would ply 2nd night sv from RWS tonight

sbst275 SG

WA.. SMRT has special webbie on RWS svs

http://www.smrt.com.sg/buses/sentosaservices.asp

963R/ NR1/ NR6's fare is stated w/o incl Sentosa admission ticket, like tis how they're going to collect tat $1? Or unless.... The fare is $3.25 for whole trip?

^tamago^ SG

indeed. why chinatown of all places at this time...

sbst275 SG

indeed. why chinatown of all places at this time...

think of it is to kill time... 45 mins given to get there somemore cannot park at Coleman St else 130 BC will blast horn

Alrdy the BCs purposely depart 15 mins aft e scheduled timing.

sbst275 SG

*rubs chin*

Saw RWS8 driver went to mount wheelchair ramp for couples w/ baby pram

But thing is, onboard buses aren't they supposed to fold e pram?

TIB1083L SG

And at night, 963R's load was very little.....

jayh272416 SG

imo, a more plausible solution will be to extend every third trip of 963 into RWS. it will still be labelled 963R but will be a basic service instead.

sbst275 SG

a more plausible solution will be to extend every third trip of 963 into RWS. it will still be labelled 963R but will be a basic service instead.

cannot

like tis RWS8 will kena owned inbound...

carbikebus SG

think of it is to kill time... 45 mins given to get there somemore cannot park at Coleman St else 130 BC will blast horn

Alrdy the BCs purposely depart 15 mins aft e scheduled timing.

Blast horn for what?To show pax that they're unhappy?So you support the SBST 130 BC behaviour?

carbikebus SG

*rubs chin*

Saw RWS8 driver went to mount wheelchair ramp for couples w/ baby pram

But thing is, onboard buses aren't they supposed to fold e pram?

SL mount ramp also you complain,Dun fold also complain.I wander whether you yourself got big problem inside your brain.Live and let live lah.

sbst275 SG

SL mount ramp also you complain,Dun fold also complain.I wander whether you yourself got big problem inside your brain.Live and let live lah.

you hate me until you forgot you're talking abt

isn't it supposed for baby pram to be folded up onboard e bus for e decent basic safety?

if you do not know there was a moment spate lots of complains over this folding of pram at HK affecting KMB.

^tamago^ SG

imo, a more plausible solution will be to extend every third trip of 963 into RWS. it will still be labelled 963R but will be a basic service instead.

but 963R is a weekend limited-stops service! of course it's more logical for people to do a 963 to RWS8 transfer, but part of the revenue of this service goes to bringing people faster along the 963 route.

TIB1232Z SG

Yes I agree its much faster than normal 963. :)

Took 1 full trip yesterday morning, journey was 1 hr 10 mins (even though scheduled runtime was 1 hr 30 mins).

carbikebus SG

you hate me until you forgot you're talking abt

isn't it supposed for baby pram to be folded up onboard e bus for e decent basic safety?

if you do not know there was a moment spate lots of complains over this folding of pram at HK affecting KMB.

You misunderstand me.Why must use hate?Actually i already feel bored and sometime piss off with your never ending hatred towards SMRT although they sucks.This is a bus forum for any bus related issue not a forum for hatred or nitpickers.Sometimes the parents die die dont wanna fold the pram but lock the wheel instead then what can the SL do?While i was a BC & SL also got gong gong couples die die dun wanna fold their blardy pram even i told them in a nice manner,So what can i do?

tintinspartan SG

963R tonight is really quite empty. The demand doesn't come from RWS since it's not fully operational. I bet that when Universal Studios opens, the demand would come in. RWS88 is the same story. Not much demand from both RWS and City Hall. Also, RWS88, NR1, NR6 and 963R wasn't well noticed by most ppl there. Most ppl went straight for RWS8.

jayh272416 SG

cannot

like tis RWS8 will kena owned inbound...

then now 963R kena owned instead.

Junyang700 SG

I heard RWS8, 68, 88's admission to Sentosa Island is waived. For 963R, do they have to pay the admission fee? Or it is waived like the other RWS services?

tintinspartan SG

I heard RWS8, 68, 88's admission to Sentosa Island is waived. For 963R, do they have to pay the admission fee? Or it is waived like the other RWS services?

No. It's also waived. I paid the maximum $2.35 fare for the bus thru cash and took full trip from Woodlands to RWS.

ahjack 77 SG

In the other words, I can just take NR1/NR6 to RWS and out of RWS at a flat fare of $3.50?

« Previous Page Next Page »