Erm excuse me I was referring to the transportation industry
overseas, where there is much liberalisation, unlike here. Please
don't go into the automobile sector, becoz the automobile sector is
complex and not relevant to the discussion here.
There are many transport operators in Europe and USA for
instance. Premium long distance buses is a good point in which
elaboration is not necessary. There are many operators like
Grayhound which have given out market share. This is what I meant.
The government should not overly harp on its two entities and be
open about competition. The local government is just too scared on
anything that could potentially destabilise the industry, though
that is unfounded.
you started saying abt anti - compeition laws in e West. thing
is, in reality in there's still protectionalism in e much acclaimed
'free' West
Long distance bus routes have a bigger market share because of
it's capacity issue. 1 coach can carry just like 30 passengers per
trip and it's still very limited on e frequencies. Just like e SIN
- KL or SIN - IPH rts.
if you really open up public tpt, would e smaller player end up
folking out more $$ to buy buses? buying say 100 buses vs 500 buses
at 1 go now?
dun ever forget what happened in e 1970s over the 3 chinese bus
co? no one had been interested to buy double decks or going OMTS
though buses were packed terribly compared till today. Maybe they
lacked capital to invest on it being small companies. It was only
till e merger to SBS tat things changed.
if you give it to smaller co maybe e private operators. are they
going to be interested in runnnig it from 0530 - 2400 when alrdy
say only peak hr feeder svs back in e past? now to say investing in
double decks
dun ever talk abt compeition for e sake of it