CCL Bus Rationalisation

last SG · 2009-04-19T20:31:15+00:00

For those who have read the newspapers, there wun be any rationalisation for CCL line. Was reported in LHZB last weekend. Thank u for the support in this thr...

SBST390 SG

Sv 105 alrdy has CNG based at SLBP

That does not matter where it rests. Can you make it run A/P shift

sbst275 SG

based on e 40 trains ordered.. seems peak hr freq at most can only be 4 mins for CCL

sbst275 SG

That does not matter where it rests. Can you make it run A/P shift

it has always been S shift buses oweing to e cost

SBST390 SG

whats your point here?

What is the purpose of this thread?

Any bus rationalisation would have been announced by now for CCL3.

SBST390 SG

it has always been S shift buses oweing to e cost

Cost of wad? come, i give you a chance to eat back your post first

sbst275 SG

Cost of wad? come, i give you a chance to eat back your post first

e cost of using CNG vs diesel to operate e fleet. it was mentioned in BT many yrs ago

TIB537B SG

Great. I like this... somebody is able to talk and quote sources. unlike the othe keyboard fortune tellers. This is the kind of constructive post we should all look to, not spamming threads to up post counts.

Even though it is stated that there will be no rationalisation, but who knows in the near future?

So , what's your post trying to say?

jayh272416 SG

What is the purpose of this thread?

Any bus rationalisation would have been announced by now for CCL3.

um since when did this thread say CCL3? is there an invisible 3 in front?

i only see "CCL Bus Rationalisation".

SBST390 SG

Even though it is stated that there will be no rationalisation, but who knows in the near future?

So , what's your post trying to say?

based on TS first post, you sentence above already contradicts itself.

sbst275 SG

based on TS first post, you sentence above already contradicts itself.

you said since when there's going to be rationalisation in e first place

Don't all of you read the papers!!! Or too poor to buy???

Newspaper already mentioned no rationalisation for CCL, so why the thread. Or we have too many people jiak bah bo sai pang become keyboard fortune teller

SBST390 SG

e cost of using CNG vs diesel to operate e fleet. it was mentioned in BT many yrs ago

Gosh ... singapore newspaper fart what, you tarik what.

ever wondered might it because of the fuel tank capacity which makes it having to off service to refuel

TIB537B SG

Cost of wad? come, i give you a chance to eat back your post first

Eat back your own post ba because given the posts that you wrote above, i feel you

(a) do not know your facts

(b) living in a fantasy world of your own where SMRT operates CCL in 4 "cab" config

So, i'll suggest you check your facts before posting here and not " spamming threads to up post counts."

sbst275 SG

Gosh ... singapore newspaper fart what, you tarik what.

ever wondered might it because of the fuel tank capacity

do you know e price of CNG in e first place? and by saying tat, you're saying e press statement from SBS to BT was bs?

sbst275 SG

as for off service to refuel, isn't SBS doing it for 161 & 168 right now?

TIB537B SG

based on TS first post, you sentence above already contradicts itself.

I said who knows in the near future, which can mean another 5 -10 years down the road LTA may consider changing the routes depending on CCL's/ bus route's performance and feedback from the public.

TIB1010Y SG

I start this topic jus for general discussion.. lol.. didnt expect u all guys to take it so seriously,

honestly, the rationlization for CCL in future will b very different in the past compare to NSL, EWL, BPLRT,NEL cos LTA took over bus planning.

Who knows there might be a "3rd bus coy" in future? Be prepare to c SBS/SMRT bus serving yur neighourhood which is impossible now.

N when DTL is complete, another history in public transport again

SBST390 SG

as for off service to refuel, isn't SBS doing it for 161 & 168 right now?

Jurong East to JI refueling station is about 15 to 18KM round trip... much much longer than for 161 and 168 to go to their depots to refuel... notice that 168 goes to BNDEP to refuel?? I am wondering if the serangoon north CNG station can take in a gassy

SBST390 SG

I start this topic jus for general discussion.. lol.. didnt expect u all guys to take it so seriously,

honestly, the rationlization for CCL in future will b very different in the past compare to NSL, EWL, BPLRT,NEL cos LTA took over bus planning.

Who knows there might be a "3rd bus coy" in future? Be prepare to c SBS/SMRT bus serving yur neighourhood which is impossible now.

N when DTL is complete, another history in public transport again

Thank you.

Since the rationalisation in 1993 and 2001, majority of the bus services left have been very backbone services.

Hence there is no need to speculate

sbst275 SG

but still isn't SLBP buses gotta go from SLBP to JI for refuelling?

in view of cost and log issues tat's why they're only on S shift

sbst275 SG

Thank you.

Since the rationalisation in 1993 and 2001, majority of the bus services left have been very backbone services.

Hence there is no need to speculate

e 1993 rationalisation, new bus svs like 151 were introduced

« Previous Page Next Page »