Quote:
Nice reply, let me analyse the different situations in the
various Interchanges
Ang Mo Kio
Interchange
Generally packed, not much free space, full usage
Bedok
Interchange
Full usage of parking space, the empty slot is hard to fill in
as those exsisting services already park until no more empty
spaces
Bishan
Interchange
Quite used up, with potential of 1-2 services
Boon Lay
Interchange
it is now filled up with JIS and quite a lot of other services,
but spaces are available when some JIS transferred to Joo Koon
Bukit Batok
interchange
Not so pack, potential of 2 services occupying the empty end-on
berths
Bukit Merah
Interchange
Full usage, not enough space already to the already narrow
buliding, if want more space, why not extend bus parking to the
mulit-story carpark....
Bukit Panjang
Interchange
Full usage of the pityful 10 SD and 6 bendy slots
CCK
Interchange
This interchange has the potential of 2-3 services
Clementi (Temp structure)
Enous
Interchange
A lot of empty space, especially when it is at the 93 and 94
berths, can take in a good 6 services
Harbourfront
Int
Full usage
Hougang Central
Int
No more services pls, a poor 27 driver had been circulating in
the interchange for 10 minutes before a empty space
JE Int
Enough spaces for more services,
Pasir Ris
Quite packed....but 1 low demand service maybe fine
Pongool Int (Temp)
Sembawang
interchange
Quite empty, used as a swing parking instead for several
services, had the potential to take in 4 services given SMRT small
fleet
Sengkang
Int
Packed already
Serangoon
Int
It is generally used, however spaces are available, both end on
and sawtooth, can take in 2-3 services
Tampines
Int
Full except SMRT maybe can 2 more services
Toa payoh
int
No more services spaces
Woodlands
Regional
No more space
Yishun
Interchange
This interchange is generally utilized up to the cafe, after
which up to customer service is almost empty, so can take in 3-5
services
I hope that by this guideline people could know which
interchanges can take in services and which cannot
Terminals are excluded....most are full or too far off
From what i know Tampines is maxed out. Not a single slot
available. Furthermore now got "god-knows-what" renovation which is
affected large areas of the interchange. TP Int is a hellhole
during rainy days...
Bedok, what u said were correct. But sv 40 need to be at the
17/38/empty berth. Then sv 401 can take the existing sv 40 slot.
Although i would prefer that 401 be further extended to...
Pasir Ris Int... I thought it was full? Anyways even if they
have available slots, they should reallocate it to sv 5. Those poor
people queueing for 5 should be given a proper berth me thinks.
How about this then?
Service 34M - Punggol Int to Changi Airport via Tampines St 83, Ave
3, St 82, Ave 4, Ave 1
Service 34 - Punggol Int to Changi Airport via current route.
I rather want an amendment of 293 than 291, and don't you think
your amendment is too "childish"? Waste time.Waste Fuel.
I don't see a need to amend 293. 291 is the main problem. Can
someone at SBST Route management please allocate double deckers to
this route please~! I remember several years ago ddeckers did the
route well, why change?! Haizz... And TP St 82 needs to be
served. It is one of the most densest population area in TP. I am
really surprised why there are no services on st 82. If 293 needs
to be amended, then it should be the frequencies. And like I said
earlier, the problem with Tampines is the town planning. That was
not done well(just look at av 5, why that stupid bend around
swimming complex??!!!) with road going everywhere but not linking
properly( St 82 should have been joined to Av 5) and neither should
there have been a bend round near the tp station(if u know what i
mean). It is the HORRIBLE town planning the planners did!
SBS8033D would you care to elaborate what 293 needs
amending?
