Service 129
Clementi Int
Clementi Ave 3
Commonwealth Ave West
Commonwealth Ave
Holland Ave
Holland Rd
Farrer Rd
Adam Rd
PIE
Jln Toa Payoh
PIE
Bedok North Ave 3
Bedok North Rd
Bedok North Ave 4
Simei Ave
PIE / TPE
Loyang Ave
Changi Village Rd
Changi Village Term
Express 509 (Might Be Quite Long)
Soon Lee Bus Park
Soon Lee Dr
Pioneer Rd North
Jurong West St 63
Jurong West St 64
Jurong West Ctrl 1
Boon Lay Ave
Corporation Rd
Jurong West Ave 1
Jurong East Ave 1
Jurong Town Hall Rd
PIE
Jln Toa Payoh
PIE
Bedok North Rd
Tampines Ave 10
Tampines Ave 1
Tampines Ave 8
Tampines Ave 3
Tampines Ave 4
Tampines Ave 5
PIE
Upper Changi Rd North
Loyang Way
Loyang Ave
Changi Village Rd
Changi Village Term
NEW! Service 89M Hougang>CCAC(loop) (89e will be
removed)
Hougang Int
Hougang Ave 10
Punggol Rd
Sengkang East Ave
Compassvale Rd
Compassvale St
Punggol Rd
TPE (Skips Pasir Ris)
Loyang Ave (It will serve Blk149A and Blk295 bus stops)
Telok Paku Rd
Nicoll Dr
Airline Rd
Airport Cargo Rd
(loop)
89M will have the same operation hours as 89 as some people from
Hougang/Sengkang might want to go to Loyang Industrial Area,
Pasir Ris(Near loyang ave area), CGV or Changi Beach more
quickly.
Due to too many services terminating at CGV Term, it will be
upgraded into a big interchange , CGV Int.
Services terminating at CGV Int : 2, 29, 49M, 59, 89, 109,
129, 149 and 509
Services looping at CCAC : 9, 19, 49 and 89M
As for interchange matters, do you really think we need to
expand CGV for so many services, why not extend some to nearest
interchanges such as bedok or pasir ris, i know that bedok is quite
thight as for now, but we shall see a new interchange soon, in
addition, before making any routes, see that is there any demand,
for example, if you want for changi village routes, i know the
demand is for loyang industral and CACC, but why not period all
routes at CACC, and allow CGV its tranquility, why complicate
matters when there is not a need, in addition, there is seriously
no space to expand CGV, a eat in to Changi beach park is bad.