I think we have some issues about Wikipedia which needs to be
ironed out:
1) WAB services
2) Euro 3, 4 and 5
3) Premium Services.
4) References
To people who edit Wikipedia:
1) Is there a need to put WAB sign for all services which have
B9TLs, K230UBs, OC500LE even though some of them have not been
certified? Doing so would cause confusion. You do need to know that
people using Wikipedia may not be bus fans, who knows they may even
be wheelchair bound people and they may think that some services
are WAB services even though they have not been certified.
Furthermore, some services with the wheelchair sign beside them
only got one or two cameos or hasn't used WABs for a long time.
2) Euro 3, 4 and 5: Again, is there a need to put these info? Do
you think people care about what buses SBST and SMRT use on their
services. Also, if you put Euro 3, 4 and 5, why not also put Euro 1
and 2 and pre-Euro in (I'm sarcastic here in case you don't know).
Put it bluntly, its trying to tell people that we are new into
higher emission standards. Throw face only.
3) Again, is there a need to put in premium services which don't
start service from the interchange or terminal when the article is
about services in the interchange or terminal. Yes, we do know that
SBST's website does put the interchange/terminal where the buses
are despatched from, but this again leads to confusion. Also, some
premium service (especially SMRT ones) aren't even despatched from
the interchanges, even though they serve the town. There is simply
no need for such info to be included in the interchanges'
pages.
4) For the references portion of interchange pages, is there a
need to put in ALL press releases for services starting from an
interchange even though there is no mention about the press
releases in the article. Some of the press releases have little
importance to the article at all, for example, road diversions.
Wiki need all sources to be persent, read WP:Verfiablity......so
4. is a must
