sbst275 SG Don't think SBST wants to take these route too.... it'll be bundled up somehowactually 178 do have its uses
^tamago^ SG At least 852 is good? SBST really KP leh.... wad if SMRT stab them in the back on converting SBST svc to peak hour service how?as mentioned above it is a typo.... don't think you can try to make suggestions on your rivals' services serving their own residents right?
slayer2004 SG looking forward for this Jun 08 SBS Transit Ltd 1 Introduction of cross-territorial trunk Service 117 New
jayh272416 SG At least 852 is good? SBST really KP leh.... wad if SMRT stab them in the back on converting SBST svc to peak hour service how? dun tell me u have such a low common sense that u cant even tell that its an error.
Scania N113CRB l0v3r SG dun tell me u have such a low common sense that u cant even tell that its an error. wad? wad thing error... U mean the word?
SBS2695H SG wad? wad thing error... U mean the word? The error is with the PTC website. The rejection should be listed as SMRT Buses rather than SBS Transit as Service 178 is under SMRT Buses. Please use some common sense.
