I did not take note of the current B10M torque band when I was
with SBS. Are you referring to the THD101GC instead? Because I do
experience pretty good acceleration from 1200 rpm for the THD102KF.
In fact many drivers hardly drive at higher revs, unless overtaking
or overcoming steep slopes with heavy loads, or just to have some
fun.
I have found that the THD102KF isn't as good as previous
generations. The THD100D (used on Volvo B58s, B59s and early
model B10Ms) was the best.
According to the Scania website, the K230UB maximum power
is attained at 1800rpm, which means that the ZF gearbox should
upshift at 1800rpm at maximum acceleration. I think I can safely
assume that the acceleration for the K230UB should be better than
the B10M at narrower gear ratios and same torque ratings.
In normal everyday traffic, how often does one push a bus engine
to 1,800rpm? The answer is generally rarely ever unless the
transmission is ill-suited to the task at hand. An engine
with high torque at low engine speeds as well as a suitable
transmission with suitable programming are therefore required for
good in-traffic acceleration characteristics. In order to
calculate the optimal up-shifting engine speed, it is necessary to
investigate passenger comfort levels (read: shifting comfort) as
well as specific fuel consumption of the engine at various
speeds. Up-shifting at 1,800rpm is unnecessary - operating an
engine at or above it's 'rated' speed (yellow to red on the
tachograph) results in high fuel consumption and unnecessary engine
wear. It is therefore wise to ensure that the engine operates
within its 'green zone' as much as possible. At the same
time, it is also unwise to operate an engine at speeds below the
'green zone', as again fuel economy, performance, engine life and
smoothness suffers. Allowing an engine to run below the
'green zone' also promotes 'hunting' - where the transmission is
constantly 'between gears' - resulting in poor passenger comfort
levels.
In order to understand why new buses may not perform the same as
older buses, it is necessary to understand the concept of torque
reduction. Many new engines are fitted with OBD (On-Board
Diagnostics) systems that monitor the health of the engine as well
as the exhaust output. In order to guarantee low emissions
levels, some engines are 'cut back' at low speeds under full
load. If the OBD system detects an engine fault, the torque
output of the engine is also reduced. From experience, newer
buses require more frequent servicing to ensure reliable
operation.
Remember, official engine power and torque figures are
measured under ideal circumstances.
So the only thing that can get in the way of better acceleration
is the unladen weight. Do you agree?
As above, there are more variables than you think. Modern
buses, with all their creature comforts, safety and emissions
control gear will almost always be significantly heavier than
previous generations of buses.
Regards,
Dave