huh? dumped? 7 trunk Vs 4 feeder. U should know
why K230UB are deployed on some of the feeder service. If that's
case, let svc 145 have one WAB which is MAN? No point leh.
Reflection u said this..
"cos CITY should be given priority. would you want all the mark
III, Scania N113CRB and LO3x be used in the city and deploy all
those B9TL on heartland services like 119? 243? den put full fleet
LO3x and VO2x on 51, 143?
this would promote good transport network to tourists and
businessmen "
read properly. AMDEP could not find a suitable service due to
its bumper. 26, 124, 145 were the obvious failures.
it appears AMK, Toa Payoh End-ons, YCK, Bishan, St
Mikes didnt pass so they had to put it on those services.
understand? they gave priority to alot of services but they failed.
They gave 232 and 238 the highest demand BR service that uses Toa
Payoh sawtooth berths. i dunno why they didnt give 157 maybe
cos SLBP didnt want to give K230s to 157. you want more old
buses in the city den in the heartlands? you want those B9TL to be
put nearer to the heartlands like 243 den 51? must make
sense. already got this bumper problem. why not give
MAN demo a better try at AMDEP
