The point is not to have TV mobile on buses - it's a
nuisance.
and SBS does pocket $$ from TV mobile.Has the money been
used to keep fares low, or make pockets richer? no idea.
Farney....why would SBST need to use the revenue to keep fare
low??? If there is a need to do that, then it shouldn't be
incorporated in the first place.
In the real world, competition do not always result in lowest
prices...it's naive to think that. When things are already at cost,
it's what value[s] that is added to the basic.
It's the gahmen that's the problem. It's a fact that gahmen
CANNOT offer competitive inputs without resorting to privatising
public services. It's the gahmen that see subsidies as a 'bad
word'.
Just take TVM as TVM, do you like it or not..doesn't matter if
that affect the fare.
