The calculations assume CW2 has 10 trips full every day, and the
other 60 trips are empty. Similarly, CW3 is assumed to have 15
trips with moderate passenger volume, and the other 55 trips are
empty. The 10 and 15 are peak-hour trips. It is assumed that
off-peak revenues are comparable to one another.
With reduced frequencies during off-peak hours, the variable costs
of both services reduce, but the cost reduction is probably more
apparent in the case of CW3, due to the considerably higher toll
charges.
Unlike CW2, the CW3 route may not be able to support more than one
service. But with only one service at this time, it is probably not
too unprofitable.
