Kheng Peng SG let us list the sbst services that cannot be use DDs due to things like heights limits etc let me start the ball rolling 39 and 85 - heights limits in yishun interchange (personally i would like to see 39 uses DDs actually ) 24, 27, 34, 36, 53 - heights limits in changi airport
Volvo Olympian SG Hmm , quite a lot actually Service 66 Due to low tress near SCGS if im not wrong Service 16 Low Bridge (3.8m high) at Merdeka Bridge And many more....
swee_heng SG [quote]Originally posted by Volvo Olympian: [b]Hmm , quite a lot actually Service 66 Due to low tress near SCGS if im not wrong If there's the case , why 74 , 174 & 157 hv no problem travelling there? Maybe they're juz saving the cost. Why is it that 52 & 105 doesn't have DD , 105's route shouldn't have problem for a DD. Same for 100 & 186. For 186 , i remembered 7206D was perm on 186 before being transferred to SLBP , just dunno why now got no DD on 186.
Volvo Olympian SG Excuse me , 74 , 174 and 157 doesn't even go near SCGS , do you even know where is SCGS in the first place? Even when 67 were under SBS also no DD's And please , 105 cannot have DD due to Lor chuan part 186 is i think due to long frequency and i think not many people take 186 thats why.
TWS4793 SG All Bedok, Tampines and Pasir Ris feeder services (except Townlink 222) are unable to use double deckers. I can probably explain why for Service 225: Low trees at turning at Bedok North Street 3 immediately after turning in from Bedok North Avenue 2. The others I am unable to explain.
Volvo Olympian SG 292 and 293 nvr use VO2x before Pasir Ris only got 354 as feeder , so of cos no need DD's
Scania SG Yah right, explain DDs on 291, 359. Actually it isn't about low trees, there aint any along these feeders, its the number of stops people usually take, if they take less stops, they would usually be at the lower deck, thus using a DD is not feasible because you'll get a lower deck full but upper deck empty situation. Bendies are better suited for feeders as people don't mind walking to the back.
swee_heng SG I dun really think so. If not Vo2x shouldn't even appear on 186 last time. Now could be because 186 serve most housing estates before going to Shenton Way.
sbst275 SG 3, 15, 16, 24, 27, 34, 36, 39, 48, 53, 66, 73, 85, 95, 96, 105, 124, 131, 145, 151, 156, 159, 170 But can someone verify for 29 and 33
swee_heng SG VO2x also. i remembered 7209X was perm on 186 before being transferred to SLBP for Jurong Industral Service , up till now , no DDs were seen on 186 & i dun think there's chance to see 186 having DD now as it doesn't even happen now , to see it is very vagrant or 100% impossible. Anyone knows other 186 Vo2x perm other than 7209X?
