SL 334 and SL 97 seems to have well-maintained fleets.
(including the crossovers, and 97e)
BB 99, the VO3x Batch IIs are OK. 9225K and 9227E are in sorry
states. No way for comparison.
SL 52/AM 52, both seem ok. When SL 52 got their first buses, they
all seemed to be in sorry states. Today, most of them improved. AM
52 also got an improvement. However, don't look here for a broken
speed limiter.
BB 156 is in a sorry state.
BR 143 looks pretty much OK.
AM 162 looks average at best. Recommend me 2804? Ok. I'll try. 2801
to me is average at best.
BN 66 is disgusting. "Burnt" Striders, "burnt" MK IIs, what
more?
HG 80's maintenance looks pretty decent. Whether it's truly ok is a
different story; I haven't really taken them.
HG 105 is ok, but not what you call impressive.
The DTs on HG 62 seem ok. Controllable.
HG 27, in the times I've taken, don't seem to be very
well-maintained. Fuming air-conditioner, and fanbelts, but the
fanbelt problem is not very serious on HG 27.
My best-maintained criteria:
1) structural integrity of the bus.
2) ability to CONTROL. (not speed. Speed then crash?)
3) The presence of a speed limiter (if it's broken, what
maintenance is that?)
4) The amount of patchwork done on the bus. (if there's a lot of
patchwork compared to ordinary flaws, it shows the depot is
effective in patching, even if the colour may not be correct.
Recall the R on reuse and R on recycle?)
With regards to flaming, why flame? There're people around who are
living in the very estates which you're criticising about, but you
don't see them getting their face black and bombarding you with
barrages of questions on "Why?"
My residence allows me to experience a little of Soon Lee, Hougang,
Bedok North, Bukit Batok and Ang Mo Kio. You can say negative
things about other buses. Just accept it and consider them. That's
all.